Dosimetric evaluation of cone‐beam CT‐based synthetic CTs in pediatric patients undergoing intensity‐modulated proton therapy. Issue 6 (12th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sheikh, Khadija; Liu, Dezhi; Li, Heng; Acharya, Sahaja; Ladra, Matthew M.; Hrinivich, William T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 23:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-04-12
• Subjects: adaptive radiotherapy -- cone‐beam CT -- image‐guided radiotherapy -- intensity‐modulated proton therapy -- pediatric cancer; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13604
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate dosimetric changes detected using synthetic computed tomography (sCT) derived from online cone‐beam CTs (CBCT) in pediatric patients treated using intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: Ten pediatric patients undergoing IMPT and aligned daily using proton gantry‐mounted CBCT were identified for retrospective analysis with treated anatomical sites fully encompassed in the CBCT field of view. Dates were identified when the patient received both a CBCT and a quality assurance CT (qCT) for routine dosimetric evaluation. sCTs were generated based on a deformable registration between the initial plan CT (pCT) and CBCT. The clinical IMPT plans were re‐computed on the same day qCT and sCT, and dosimetric changes due to tissue change or response from the initial plan were computed using each image. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between dosimetric changes detected using the qCT and the sCT. Gamma analysis was also used to compare the dose distributions computed on the qCT and sCT. Results: The correlation coefficients ( p ‐values) between qCTs and sCTs for changes detected in target coverage, overall maximum dose, and organ at risk dose were 0.97 (< .001), 0.84 (.002) and 0.91 (< .001), respectively. Mean ± SD gamma pass rates of the sCT‐based dose compared to the qCT‐based dose at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm criteria were 96.5%±4.5%, 93.2%±6.3%, and 91.3%±7.8%, respectively. Pass rates tended to be lower for targets near lung. Conclusion: While insufficient for re‐planning, sCTs provide approximate dosimetry without administering additional imaging dose in pediatric patients undergoing IMPT. Dosimetric changes detected using sCTs are correlated with changes detected using clinically‐standard qCTs; however, residual differences in dosimetry remain a limitation. Further improvements in sCT image quality may both improve online dosimetric evaluation and reduce imaging dose for pediatric patients by reducing the need for routine qCTs.