Simplified Edinburgh CT Criteria for Identification of Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. (17th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sembill, Jochen A.; Knott, Michael; Xu, Mingming; Roeder, Sebastian S.; Hagen, Manuel; Sprügel, Maximilian I.; Mrochen, Anne; Borutta, Matthias; Hoelter, Philip; Engelhorn, Tobias; Rothhammer, Veit; Macha, Kosmas; Kuramatsu, Joji B.
• Is Part Of: Neurology. Volume 98:Number 20(2022)
• Page Start: e1997
• Page End: e2004
• Publication Date: 2022-05-17
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurologie -- Périodiques; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200261
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3878

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objectives: In patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), etiologic characterization represents a tradeoff between feasibility, resource allocation, and diagnostic certainty. This study investigated the accuracy and clinical utility of the simplified Edinburgh CT criteria to identify underlying cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Methods: This external validation analyzed 210 consecutive patients with lobar ICH and available CT and MRI studies from a prospective single-center observational cohort study (2006–2015, Longitudinal Cohort Study on ICH Care [UKER-ICH, ] NCT03183167). We investigated the interrater variability and diagnostic accuracy of the simplified Edinburgh CT-based criteria for identification of ICH associated with probable CAA according to MRI-based modified Boston criteria as a reference standard. We evaluated the utility of the simplified Edinburgh criteria by decision curve analysis, comparing the theoretical clinical net benefit (weighted benefit-harm at varying threshold probabilities) of the high-risk category (finger-like projections and subarachnoid hemorrhage) for ruling in and the low-risk category (neither finger-like projections nor subarachnoid hemorrhage) for ruling out with the assumptions of no or all patients having CAA (default strategies). Results: Of 210 patients, 70 (33.3%) had high risk, 67 (31.9%) had medium risk, and 73 (34.8%) had low risk for CAA-associated ICH according to simplified Edinburgh CT criteria, showing moderate interrater variability. Discrimination was good (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.74, 95% CI 0.67–0.81) without evidence of poor calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow, p = 0.54) for validation of MRI-based diagnosis of probable CAA (n = 94 of 210, 44.8%). The rule-in criteria (high risk), had 87.1% (79.3%–92.3%) specificity, and the rule-out criteria (low risk), had 80.9% (71.1%–88.0%) sensitivity. Decision curve analysis suggested a theoretical clinical net benefit for ruling in but not for ruling out probable CAA compared to default strategies. Discussion: Applying the simplified Edinburgh CT criteria during diagnostic workup seems clinically useful and may accurately identify CAA in patients with lobar ICH. Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03183167. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with lobar hemorrhages, the simplified Edinburgh criteria accurately identify those at high risk of CAA.