Dissociable language and executive control deficits and recovery in post-stroke aphasia: An exploratory observational and case series study. (29th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Meier, Erin L.; Kelly, Catherine R.; Hillis, Argye E.
• Is Part Of: Neuropsychologia. Number 172(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07-29
• Subjects: Aphasia -- Executive control -- Stroke recovery -- Case series -- Dissociation; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Neuropsychologie -- Périodiques; Neuropsychology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108270
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3932

Abstract

Abstract: A growing body of evidence indicates many, but not all, individuals with post-stroke aphasia experience executive dysfunction. Relationships between language and executive function skills are often reported in the literature, but the degree of interdependence between these abilities remains largely unanswered. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the extent to which language and executive control deficits dissociated in 1) acute stroke and 2) longitudinal aphasia recovery. Twenty-three individuals admitted to Johns Hopkins Hospital with a new left hemisphere stroke completed the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R), several additional language measures (of naming, semantics, spontaneous speech, and oral reading), and three non-linguistic cognitive tasks from the NIH Toolbox (i.e., Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, and Dimensional Change Card Sort Test). Two participants with aphasia (PWA) with temporoparietal lesions, one of whom (PWA1) had greater temporal but less frontal and superior parietal damage than the other (PWA2), also completed testing at subacute (three months post-onset) and early chronic (six months post-onset) time points. In aim 1, principal component analysis on the acute test data (excluding the WAB-R) revealed language and non-linguistic executive control tasks largely loaded onto separate components. Both components were significant predictors of acute aphasia severity per the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ). Crucially, executive dysfunction explained an additional 17% of the variance in AQ beyond the explanatory power of language impairments alone. In aim 2, both case patients exhibited language and executive control deficits at the acute post-stroke stage. A dissociation was observed in longitudinal recovery of these patients. By the early chronic time point, PWA1 exhibited improved (but persistent) deficits in several language domains and recovered executive control. In contrast, PWA2 demonstrated mostly recovered language but persistent executive dysfunction. Greater damage to language and attention networks in these respective patients may explain the observed behavioral patterns. These results demonstrate that language and executive control can dissociate (at least to a degree), but both contribute to early post-stroke presentation of aphasia and likely influence longitudinal aphasia recovery. Highlights: Language and executive control tests loaded onto separate factors in acute stroke. Language and executive components independently predict acute aphasia severity. Two case patients with aphasia exhibited acute deficits in both domains. A dissociation in longitudinal language and executive recovery was observed.