Understanding the impact of mandatory accrual accounting on management practices: interpretation of Japanese local governments' behavior. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kuroki, Makoto; Ishikawa, Keiko; Yamamoto, Kiyoshi
• Is Part Of: International review of administrative sciences. Volume 88:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 862
• Page End: 881
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: accrual accounting -- comprehensive approach -- management practice -- mandatory adoption; Public administration -- Periodicals; Comparative government -- Periodicals; 320
• DOI: 10.1177/0020852321988956
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-8523

Abstract

Accompanying the spread of "new public management" since the 1980s, accrual accounting and results-based management has become a global standard. However, whether accrual accounting results in successful outcomes and which drivers lead to the intended impacts of the reform have been contested. Given the mixed arguments in the literature, we set out two research questions: (1) "Have public sector organizations realized any positive impacts on management practices by adopting mandatory accrual accounting?"; and (2) "What are the primary drivers of such impacts?" To answer these questions, we examine the impact on management practices by analyzing a survey to ascertain how financial department officers in Japanese local governments perceive the benefits of adopting mandatory accrual accounting on management practices. The results indicate that they have so far not recognized the intended benefits, though they had expected higher benefits in internal control. Then, we use technical-rational, socio-political, and institutional isomorphic perspectives in a comprehensive approach to understand the impacts on management practices. The logistic analysis shows that financial managers in local governments that do not have a majority party in the assembly, but consist of several parties in power, as well as in those with greater financial dependence on the central government, perceive higher benefits. Further, we find that financial managers that imitate other local governments as a form of mimetic pressure perceive fewer benefits. The results show that some technical-rational tools, socio-political conditions, and institutional pressures change the perceived benefits for public managers of adopting mandatory accrual accounting. Points for practitioners: We find that some technical-rational, socio-political, and institutional factors explain the intended internal benefits of the mandatory adoption of accrual accounting. In practice, financial managers in local government feel the merits of accrual accounting in less autonomy in not only politics, but also finance, and few mimetic conditions. It might be understood that difficult situations would drive practitioners to use mandatory information.