Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas. (September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas. (September 2022)
- Main Title:
- Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas
- Authors:
- Yin, Yuanbo
Yang, Hao
Duan, Pengfei
Li, Luling
Zio, Enrico
Liu, Cuiwei
Li, Yuxing - Abstract:
- Highlights: We propose a quantitative risk assessment for pipelines that considers human life. We propose a method to correct the loss value of life based on population density. Our new evaluation method can effectively identify high-consequence areas. The results can be used to improve protection resources in crowded areas. Abstract: Currently, quantitative risk assessment is often used for pipeline safety analysis. However, the low probability of pipeline failure may produce a false safety evaluation result because high-consequence areas with high population densities cannot be effectively identified. Furthermore, nearly half of the gas leakage accidents in China have occurred in densely populated areas. Therefore, an improved quantitative risk assessment method is proposed. First, we establish two models: (1) a failure probability model based on improved historical failure and disaster derivation probabilities and (2) a risk consequence model considering potential direct and indirect losses based on the probability of disaster evolution. Considering the concept of human rights equality and the social model of "life is first" in China, a method to correct the loss value of life according to population density is proposed, which can effectively avoid the hidden phenomenon of high-consequence areas mentioned above. A pipeline in China is evaluated using this improved method. Compared with traditional evaluation results, the new evaluation method can effectively identify aHighlights: We propose a quantitative risk assessment for pipelines that considers human life. We propose a method to correct the loss value of life based on population density. Our new evaluation method can effectively identify high-consequence areas. The results can be used to improve protection resources in crowded areas. Abstract: Currently, quantitative risk assessment is often used for pipeline safety analysis. However, the low probability of pipeline failure may produce a false safety evaluation result because high-consequence areas with high population densities cannot be effectively identified. Furthermore, nearly half of the gas leakage accidents in China have occurred in densely populated areas. Therefore, an improved quantitative risk assessment method is proposed. First, we establish two models: (1) a failure probability model based on improved historical failure and disaster derivation probabilities and (2) a risk consequence model considering potential direct and indirect losses based on the probability of disaster evolution. Considering the concept of human rights equality and the social model of "life is first" in China, a method to correct the loss value of life according to population density is proposed, which can effectively avoid the hidden phenomenon of high-consequence areas mentioned above. A pipeline in China is evaluated using this improved method. Compared with traditional evaluation results, the new evaluation method can effectively identify a high-consequence area and obtain more reasonable results. Thus, a pipeline maintenance plan can ensure the interests of enterprises and fully respect the lives of individuals threatened by the potential risk of the pipeline. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Reliability engineering & system safety. Volume 225(2022)
- Journal:
- Reliability engineering & system safety
- Issue:
- Volume 225(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 225, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 225
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0225-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09
- Subjects:
- Quantitative risk assessment -- High-consequence area -- Natural gas pipeline -- Failure probability -- Risk consequence -- Pipeline failure
Reliability (Engineering) -- Periodicals
System safety -- Periodicals
Industrial safety -- Periodicals
Fiabilité -- Périodiques
Sécurité des systèmes -- Périodiques
Sécurité du travail -- Périodiques
620.00452 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09518320 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108583 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0951-8320
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7356.422700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21789.xml