An exploratory investigation of predictors of outcome in face‐to‐face and online cognitive‐behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa. (26th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Matherne, Camden E.; Watson, Hunna; Fassnacht, Daniel B.; Ali, Kathina; Zerwas, Stephanie; Peat, Christine; Runfola, Cristin; Levine, Michele D.; Marcus, Marsha D.; Zimmer, Benjamin; Moessner, Markus; Crosby, Ross; Bulik, Cynthia M.
• Is Part Of: European eating disorders review. Volume 30:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 373
• Page End: 387
• Publication Date: 2022-04-26
• Subjects: bulimia nervosa -- cognitive‐behavioural therapy -- eating disorders -- internet -- randomised controlled trial -- treatment outcome; Eating disorders -- Periodicals; 616.8526
• DOI: 10.1002/erv.2898
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1072-4133

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered face‐to‐face and via the internet reduces bulimia nervosa (BN) symptoms. However, our empirical understanding of factors affecting patient outcomes is limited. Method: Using data from a randomised, controlled trial comparing internet‐based (CBT4BN, n = 78) with face‐to‐face (CBTF2F, n = 71) group CBT (97% female, M = 28 years), we examined general treatment (across conditions) and modality‐specific predictors of end‐treatment and 1‐year outcomes (abstinence, binge‐eating frequency, purging frequency). Results: Improved eating disorder‐related quality of life (EDQOL) during treatment and follow‐up predicted abstinence at end‐treatment and 1‐year assessments. Improved EDQOL, disordered eating cognitions, and anxiety symptoms predicted less frequent binge eating and purging. Previous CBT and being employed predicted more frequent binge eating and purging at both assessments. Higher self‐transcendence and self‐directedness predicted less frequent binge eating. More severe binge eating and purging at baseline and end‐treatment predicted more frequent binge eating and purging at subsequent assessments. Improved EDQOL was more strongly associated with positive outcome in CBT4BN; improved depressive symptoms and health‐related QOL predicted positive outcome in CBT4BN but not CBTF2F. Discussion: Symptom improvement and certain character traits predicted positive outcome, whereas more severe presentation and prior CBT experience predicted poorer outcome. Consideration of intreatment symptom improvement may facilitate care recommendations, particularly for internet‐based modalities. Highlights: This study examined predictors of end‐treatment and 1‐year outcome from a randomised controlled trial comparing internet‐based (CBT4BN) with face‐to‐face (CBTF2F) cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa. Improvement in eating disorder‐related quality of life, disordered eating cognitions, and anxiety symptoms were the most consistent predictors of positive response to treatment. Relations between associated symptom improvement, namely general‐ and eating disorder‐related quality of life and depressive symptoms, and positive outcome were most evident in CBT4BN. Being employed, greater binge‐eating and purging severity, and a previous course of CBT most consistently predicted poor outcome. The character traits self‐directedness and self‐transcendence predicted less frequent binge eating at both outcome assessments.