1.5 versus 3 Tesla structural MRI in patients with focal epilepsy. Issue 2 (7th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhu, Hanjie; Scott, James; Hurley, Alison; Gaxiola‐Valdez, Ismael; Peedicail, Joseph S.; Federico, Paolo
• Is Part Of: Epileptic disorders. Volume 24:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 274
• Page End: 286
• Publication Date: 2022-06-07
• Subjects: MRI -- focal epilepsy -- epilepsy surgery -- EEG; Epilepsy -- Periodicals; 616.853
• DOI: 10.1684/epd.2021.1384
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1294-9361

Abstract

Abstract: Objective. Structural MRI is a critical component in the pre‐surgical investigation of epilepsy, as identifying an epileptogenic lesion increases the chance of post‐surgical seizure freedom. In general practice, 1.5T and 3T MRI scans are still the mainstream in most epilepsy centres, particularly in resource‐poor countries. When 1.5T MRI is non‐lesional, a repeat scan is often performed as a higher‐field structural scan, usually 3T. However, it is not known whether scanning at 3T increases diagnostic yield in patients with focal epilepsy. We sought to compare lesion detection and other features of 1.5T and 3T MRI acquired in the same patients with epilepsy. Methods. MRI scans (1.5T and 3T) from 100 patients were presented in a blinded, randomized order to two neuroradiologists. The presence, location, and number of potentially epileptogenic lesions were compared. In addition, tissue contrast and the presence of motion/technical artifacts were compared using a 4‐point subjective scale. Results. Both the qualitative tissue contrast and motion/technical artifacts were improved at 3T. However, this did not result in statistically significant improvement in lesion detection. Qualitatively, five patients had subtle lesions seen only at 3T. However, minor differences in image acquisition parameters between 1.5T and 3T scans in these cases may have resulted in greater lesion visibility at 3T in four patients. Based on a general linear model analysis, the presence of a focal abnormality on EEG was predictive of the presence of a lesion at 1.5T and 3T. Significance. Repeat MRI scanning of patients with focal epilepsy at 3T using similar scan protocols does not significantly increase diagnostic yield over scanning at 1.5T; the increased signal‐to‐noise ratio can potentially be better allocated for novel scan sequences in order to provide more clinical value.