Citizen science for Earth Observation (Citizens4EO): understanding current use in the UK. Issue 8 (18th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boyd, Doreen S.; Foody, Giles M.; Brown, Chloe; Mazumdar, Suvodeep; Marshall, Harry; Wardlaw, Jessica
• Is Part Of: International journal of remote sensing. Volume 43:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: 2965
• Page End: 2985
• Publication Date: 2022-04-18
• Subjects: Citizen Science -- Training -- Validation -- UN SDGs; Remote sensing -- Periodicals; Télédétection -- Périodiques; 621.3678
• DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2022.2076574
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-1161

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The role of Earth observation (EO) data in addressing societal problems from environmental through to humanitarian should not be understated. Recent innovation in EO means provision of analysis ready data and data cubes, which allows for rapid use of EO data. This in combination with processing technologies, such as Google Earth Engine and open source algorithms/software for EO data integration and analyses, has afforded an explosion of information to answer research questions and/or inform policy making. However, there is still a need for both training and validation data within EO projects – often this can be challenging to obtain. It has been suggested that citizen science can help here to provide these data, yet there is some perceived hesitancy in using citizen science within EO projects. This paper reports on the Citizen Science 4 EO (Citizens4EO) project that aimed to obtain an in-depth understanding of researchers' and practitioners' experiences with citizen science data in EO within the UK. Through a mixed methods approach (online and in-depth surveys and a spotlight case study) it was found that although the benefits of using citizen science data in EO projects were many (and highlighted in the spotlighted "Slavery from Space" case study), there were a number of common concerns around using citizen science. These were around the mechanics of deploying citizen science and the unreliability of a potentially misinformed or undertrained citizen base. As such, comparing the results of this study with those of a similar survey undertaken in 2016, it is apparent that progress towards optimizing citizen science use in EO has been incremental but positive with evidence of the realization of the benefits of citizen science for EO (Citizens4EO). As such, we conclude by offering priority action areas to support further use of citizen science by the EO community within the UK, which ultimately should be adopted further afield.