Association Between Social Vulnerability and Achieving Glycemic Control Among Pregnant Individuals With Pregestational Diabetes. Issue 6 (2nd June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Venkatesh, Kartik K.; Germann, Katherine; Joseph, Joshua; Kiefer, Miranda; Buschur, Elizabeth; Thung, Stephen; Costantine, Maged M.; Gabbe, Steven; Grobman, William A.; Fareed, Naleef
• Is Part Of: Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 139:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: 1051
• Page End: 1060
• Publication Date: 2022-06-02
• Subjects: Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; 618
• DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004727
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0029-7844

Abstract

Abstract : Pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes living in an area with higher social vulnerability were less likely to achieve glycemic control. Abstract : OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between community-level social vulnerability and achieving glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c [Hb A1c ] less than 6.0% or less than 6.5%) among individuals with pregestational diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort of individuals with pregestational diabetes with singleton gestations from 2012 to 2016 at a tertiary care center. Addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS and then linked at the census tract to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2018 SVI (Social Vulnerability Index), which incorporates 15 Census variables to produce a composite score and four scores across thematic domains (socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater community-level social vulnerability. The primary outcome was Hb A1c less than 6.0%, and, secondarily, Hb A1c less than 6.5%, in the second or third trimesters. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to evaluate the association between SVI score as a continuous measure and target Hb A1c . RESULTS: Among 418 assessed pregnant individuals (33.0% type 1; 67.0% type 2 diabetes), 41.4% (173/418) achieved Hb A1c less than 6.0%, and 56.7% (237/418) Hb A1c less than 6.5% at a mean gestational age of 29.5 weeks (SD 5.78). Pregnant individuals with a higher SVI score were less likely to achieve Hb A1c less than 6.0% compared with those with a lower SVI score. For each 0.1-unit increase in SVI score, the risk of achieving Hb A1c less than 6.0% decreased by nearly 50% (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.53; 95% CI 0.36–0.77), and by more than 30% for Hb A1c less than 6.5% (adjusted odds ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.51–0.88). With regard to specific SVI domains, those who scored higher on socioeconomic status (aRR 0.50; 95% CI 0.35–0.71) as well as on household composition and disability (aRR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38–0.79) were less likely to achieve Hb A1c less than 6.0%. CONCLUSION: Pregnant individuals with pregestational diabetes living in an area with higher social vulnerability were less likely to achieve glycemic control, as measured by HgbA1c levels. Interventions are needed to assess whether addressing social determinants of health can improve glycemic control in pregnancy.