A pathway for parking in line with the Paris Agreement. Issue 2 (June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johansson, Fredrik; Åkerman, Jonas; Henriksson, Greger; Envall, Pelle
• Is Part Of: Case studies on transport policy. Volume 10:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 1223
• Page End: 1233
• Publication Date: 2022-06
• Subjects: Parking standards -- Mobility standards -- Climate targets; Transportation and state -- Case studies -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Planning -- Case studies -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Research -- Case studies -- Periodicals; 388.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.04.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2213-624X

Abstract

Highlights: The paper explores a shift in parking policy seen as crucial to meet the Paris Agreement. The paper illustrates a shift from providing parking to satisfactory mobility and accessibility. The pathway combines mobility services, parking restrictions, and citizen participation. An analysis of equity, feasibility, and acceptability is provided. Abstract: Current European parking policies do not seem to steer towards a future where urban transport meets the climate goals. Prominent in current housing and parking policies are the so-called minimum parking standards . Recent research has shown that they contribute to increased car use and consequently to higher CO2 emissions. This is because they contribute to urban sprawl, extensive land use, increased housing and infrastructure construction costs, and that they restrict the number of flats per urban land unit. Other recent research shows that the construction of underground garages causes considerable CO2 emissions. This paper is based on previous research on the development of the transport sector to be in line with climate targets (i.e., the Paris Agreement). It intends to fill a research gap regarding how parking management can be designed to be consistent with these targets. Through a future study approach with Stockholm as a case example, this paper illustrates a policy shift in parking policies considered to be in line with national climate targets. The article presents concrete indicators to quantify the scope of change needed (e.g., removing 60, 000 residential parking spaces and providing vehicle sharing with 7, 500 cars and at least 7, 500 bikes). The focus shift goes from providing physical parking spaces to providing satisfactory mobility and accessibility. We outline a pathway towards a future scenario of parking and mobility in Stockholm, with a combination of mobility services, parking restrictions (e.g., cap on parking spaces, removal of minimum parking standards), and citizen participation. The pathway is also analysed regarding equity, feasibility, and acceptance.