Long-term effectiveness of empiric cardio-protection in patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapies: A systematic review & bayesian network meta-analysis. (July 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Long-term effectiveness of empiric cardio-protection in patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapies: A systematic review & bayesian network meta-analysis. (July 2022)
- Main Title:
- Long-term effectiveness of empiric cardio-protection in patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapies: A systematic review & bayesian network meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Sayed, Ahmed
Abdelfattah, Omar M.
Munir, Malak
Shazly, Omar
Awad, Ahmed K.
Ghaith, Hazem S.
Moustafa, Khaled
Gerew, Maria
Guha, Avirup
Barac, Ana
Fradley, Michael G.
Abela, George S.
Addison, Daniel - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Cardioprotective therapies represent an important avenue to reduce treatment-limiting cardiotoxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the optimal duration, strategy and long-term efficacy of empiric cardio-protection remains unknown. Methods: Leveraging the MEDLINE/Pubmed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov databases, we identified all randomised controlled trials investigating cardioprotective therapies from inception to November 2021 (PROSPERO-ID:CRD42021265006). Cardioprotective classes included ACEIs, ARBs, Beta-blockers, dexrazoxane (DEX), statins and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The primary end-point was new-onset heart failure (HF). Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change, hypotension and all-cause mortality. Network meta-analyses were used to assess the cardioprotective effects of each therapy to deduce the most effective therapies. Both analyses were performed using a Bayesian random effects model to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). Results: Overall, from 726 articles, 39 trials evaluating 5931 participants (38.0 ± 19.1 years, 72.0% females) were identified. The use of any cardioprotective strategy associated with reduction in new-onset HF (RR:0.32; 95% CrI:0.19–0.55), improved LVEF (mean difference: 3.92%; 95% CrI:2.81–5.07), increased hypotension (RR:3.27; 95% CrI:1.38–9.87) and no difference in mortality. Based on control arms, theAbstract: Background: Cardioprotective therapies represent an important avenue to reduce treatment-limiting cardiotoxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the optimal duration, strategy and long-term efficacy of empiric cardio-protection remains unknown. Methods: Leveraging the MEDLINE/Pubmed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov databases, we identified all randomised controlled trials investigating cardioprotective therapies from inception to November 2021 (PROSPERO-ID:CRD42021265006). Cardioprotective classes included ACEIs, ARBs, Beta-blockers, dexrazoxane (DEX), statins and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The primary end-point was new-onset heart failure (HF). Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change, hypotension and all-cause mortality. Network meta-analyses were used to assess the cardioprotective effects of each therapy to deduce the most effective therapies. Both analyses were performed using a Bayesian random effects model to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). Results: Overall, from 726 articles, 39 trials evaluating 5931 participants (38.0 ± 19.1 years, 72.0% females) were identified. The use of any cardioprotective strategy associated with reduction in new-onset HF (RR:0.32; 95% CrI:0.19–0.55), improved LVEF (mean difference: 3.92%; 95% CrI:2.81–5.07), increased hypotension (RR:3.27; 95% CrI:1.38–9.87) and no difference in mortality. Based on control arms, the number-needed-to-treat for 'any' cardioprotective therapy to prevent one incident HF event was 45, including a number-needed-to-treat of 21 with ≥1 year of therapy. Dexrazoxane was most effective at HF prevention (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve: 81.47%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were most effective at preserving LVEF (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve: 99.22%). Conclusion: Cardiotoxicity remains a challenge for patients requiring anticancer therapies. The initiation of extended duration cardioprotection reduces incident HF. Additional head-to-head trials are needed. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: LVEF preservation was ∼4% higher in the cardioprotective group Therapy for ≥1 year was most effective: number needed to treat 21 to prevent one HF. Empiric cardioprotective therapy reduces incident heart failure (HF) by nearly 70%. Aldosterone antagonists were most effective in preserving LVEF Dexrazoxane was most effective in preventing new onset cardiotoxic HF. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 169(2022)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 169(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 169, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 169
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0169-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- 82
- Page End:
- 92
- Publication Date:
- 2022-07
- Subjects:
- Malignancy -- Cardio-protection -- Cardio-oncology -- Heart failure -- Long-term outcomes
Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.024 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21755.xml