Provider perceptions of telehealth and in-person exposure and response prevention for obsessive–compulsive disorder. (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wiese, Andrew D.; Drummond, Kendall N.; Fuselier, Madeleine N.; Sheu, Jessica C; Liu, Gary; Guzick, Andrew G.; Goodman, Wayne K.; Storch, Eric A.
• Is Part Of: Psychiatry research. Volume 313(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: OCD -- Telehealth -- Exposure and response prevention -- Treatment -- Psychotherapy; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- periodicals; Psychiatrie -- Périodiques; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114610
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0165-1781

Abstract

Highlights: Providers report greater perceived feasibility delivering OCD treatment to individuals ages 13-to-65. Treatment for OCD is perceived to have greater feasibility at lower-levels of symptom severity over telehealth compared to in-person delivery. OCD providers repot greater ability to identify and address treatment interfering factors in-person relative to telehealth. Abstract: Until recently, psychotherapies, including exposure and response prevention (ERP) for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), have primarily been delivered in-person. The COVID-19 pandemic required OCD providers delivering ERP to quickly transition to telehealth services. While evidence supports telehealth ERP delivery, limited research has examined OCD provider perceptions about patient characteristics that are most appropriate for this modality, as well as provider abilities to identify and address factors interfering with effective telehealth ERP. In the present study, OCD therapists ( N = 113) rated the feasibility of delivering telehealth ERP relative to in-person for different (1) patient age-groups, (2) levels of OCD severity, and (3) provider ability to identify and address factors interfering with ERP during in-person and telehealth ERP (e.g., cognitive avoidance, reassurance seeking, etc.). Providers reported significantly greater feasibility of delivering telehealth ERP to individuals ages 13-to-65-years relative to other age groups assessed. Greater perceived feasibility for telehealth relative to in-person ERP was reported for lower versus higher symptom severity levels. Lastly, providers felt better able to identify and address problematic factors in-person. These findings suggest that providers should practice appropriate caution when offering telehealth ERP for certain patients with OCD. Future research may examine how to address these potential limitations of telehealth ERP delivery.