Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public's attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis. (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mertes, Heidi; Goethals, Tina; Segers, Seppe; Huysentruyt, Marie; Pennings, Guido; Provoost, Veerle
• Is Part Of: Reproductive biomedicine & society online. Volume 14(2022)
• Page Start: 156
• Page End: 168
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: In-vitro gametogenesis -- Genetic parenthood -- IVG -- Public attitudes -- Assisted reproduction -- Reproductive ethics; Reproductive health -- Periodicals; Human reproduction -- Periodicals; Reproductive health -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; Reproduction -- Periodicals; 616.69206
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-6618

Abstract

Abstract: Given the controversial nature of research into in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), this study set out to investigate the current attitudes towards IVG in the general Belgian population in order to anticipate potential future barriers and misunderstandings. A questionnaire was developed and incorporated into a web-based online survey and sent out to Belgians aged ≥ 18 years in September 2018 until a representative sample (by age, gender and region) of 1000 participants was reached. Respondents expressed an overall positive attitude towards IVG and its possible future applications, with the exception of the use of IVG in postmenopausal women. They were ambivalent about the importance of genetic parenthood and about the necessary experiments on animals and embryos to bring IVG to the clinic. While the willingness to accept greater risks for IVG than for other assisted reproductive technology treatments was low (17.5%), the use of spare in-vitro fertilization embryos to study those risks was acceptable for 55.8% of participants; embryo creation was acceptable for 38.1%; and experiments on mice and monkeys were acceptable for 45.3% and 30.4%, respectively. Finally, 85.6% of participants agreed that the Belgian Government should strictly regulate IVG. In conclusion, preclinical research into IVG and other reproductive technologies elicits a great diversity of attitudes towards the importance of genetic parenthood and the acceptability of embryo and animal research. There is a need for public dialogue on these topics.