Objective sleep assessments for healthy people in environmental research: A literature review. (18th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Xinbo; Lian, Zhiwei
• Is Part Of: Indoor air. Volume 32:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-05-18
• Subjects: accuracy -- assessment methods -- bedroom environment -- interference -- objective sleep quality; Indoor air pollution -- Periodicals; Sick building syndrome -- Periodicals; Ventilation -- Periodicals; 613.5
• DOI: 10.1111/ina.13034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-6947

Abstract

Abstract: To date, although many studies had focused on the impact of environmental factors on sleep, how to choose the proper assessment method for objective sleep quality was often ignored, especially for healthy subjects in bedroom environment. In order to provide methodological guidance for future research, this paper reviewed the assessments of objective sleep quality applied in environmental researches, compared them from the perspective of accuracy and interference, and statistically analyzed the impact of experimental type and subjects' information on method selection. The review results showed that, in contrast to polysomnography (PSG), the accuracy of actigraphy (ACT), respiratory monitoring‐oxygen saturation monitoring (RM‐OSM), and electrocardiograph (ECG) could reach up to 97%, 80.38%, and 79.95%, respectively. In terms of sleep staging, PSG and ECG performed the best, ACT the second, and RM‐OSM the worst; as compared to single methods, mix methods were more accurate and better at sleep staging. PSG interfered with sleep a great deal, while ECG and ACT could be non‐contact, and thus, the least interference with sleep was present. The type of experiment significantly influenced the choice of assessment method ( p < 0.001), 85.3% of researchers chose PSG in laboratory study while 82.5% ACT in field study; moreover, PSG was often used in a relatively small number of young subjects, while ACT had a wide applicable population. In general, researchers need to pay more attention at selection of assessments in future studies, and this review can be used as a reliable reference for experimental design.