AB0742 CONVENTIONAL SYNTHETIC DMARDS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS - CHANGING PRACTICE IN BIOLOGIC ERA: REAL-LIFE RESULTS FROM HURBIO-PsA REGISTRY. (2nd June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bilgin, E.; Duran, E.; Bolek, E. C.; Farisoğullari, B.; Yardimci, G. K.; Kiliç, L.; Akdoğan, A.; Bilgen, Ş. A.; Karadag, O.; Ertenli, A. İ.; Kiraz, S.; Kalyoncu, U.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 79(2020)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 1667
• Page End: 1667
• Publication Date: 2020-06-02
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4735
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Conventional synthetic disease modifiying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are recommended as the first-line treatment options for most of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. In the last two decades, biologic drugs become more accessible and their percentage in the daily practice is increasing continuously. However, how they influenced the utilization of csDMARDs still remains unknown, yet. Objectives: To determine the utilization rates of PsA patients before, after and at the starting of biologic DMARDs Methods: We analyzed all patients who received at least 1 dose of biologic DMARDs, registered to HURBIO-PsA database, and who have complete data regarding csDMARD use before (ever), after (at last control visit) and at the starting of biologic DMARD. Methotrexate, leflunomide and sulphasalasine were the csDMARDs recorded. Demographic data of these patients were also recorded. Results: A total of 426 (70% female) PsA patients was included. Mean age and mean PsA disease duration were 48±12.4 and 9.3±8.3 years, respectively. Mean duration of csDMARD utilization before bDMARDs was 5.8±5.1 years, and mean follow-up duration under bDMARDs was 3.7±2.5 years. Distribution of the bDMARDs that ever-prescribed as follows: adalimumab 273 (64.2%), etanercept 125 (29.3%), certolizumab pegol 103 (24.2%), infliximab 102 (24.0%), secukinumab 63 (14.8%), golimumab 55 (12.9%), ustekinumab 24 (5.6%) and tofacitinib 11 (3.4%). Percentage of each csDMARDs used before (ever used), after (at last control visit) and at the starting of biologic DMARDs were given in Figure . Also the percentage of patients using csDMARD as monotherapy and combination therapy were given in Figure . Conclusion: csDMARDs particularly sulphasalazine and methotrexate were important treatment options before bDMARD period, however they (particularly SSZ) were usually discontinued after bDMARD initiation. Rate of concomitant csDMARDs use remains relatively stable after starting the bDMARDs. Besides, rate of concomitant mono/csDMARD use is significantly higher after bDMARD initiation, in contrast to pre-bDMARD period. Disclosure of Interests: Emre Bilgin: None declared, Emine Duran: None declared, Ertugrul Cagri Bolek: None declared, Bayram Farisoğullari: None declared, Gözde Kübra Yardimci: None declared, Levent Kiliç: None declared, Ali Akdoğan: None declared, Şule Apraş Bilgen: None declared, Omer Karadag: None declared, Ali İhsan Ertenli: None declared, Sedat Kiraz: None declared, Umut Kalyoncu Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, UCB