The win ratio approach for composite endpoints: practical guidance based on previous experience. (9th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Redfors, Björn; Gregson, John; Crowley, Aaron; McAndrew, Thomas; Ben-Yehuda, Ori; Stone, Gregg W; Pocock, Stuart J
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 41:Number 46(2020)
• Page Start: 4391
• Page End: 4399
• Publication Date: 2020-09-09
• Subjects: Win ratio -- Composite endpoints -- Methods -- Clinical trials; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa665
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: The win ratio was introduced in 2012 as a new method for examining composite endpoints and has since been widely adopted in cardiovascular (CV) trials. Improving upon conventional methods for analysing composite endpoints, the win ratio accounts for relative priorities of the components and allows the components to be different types of outcomes. For example, the win ratio can combine the time to death with the number of occurrences of a non-fatal outcome such as CV-related hospitalizations (CVHs) in a single hierarchical composite endpoint. The win ratio can provide greater statistical power to detect and quantify a treatment difference by using all available information contained in the component outcomes. The win ratio can also incorporate quantitative outcomes such as exercise tests or quality-of-life scores. There is a need for more practical guidance on how best to design trials using the win ratio approach. This manuscript provides an overview of the principles behind the win ratio and provides insights into how to implement the win ratio in CV trial design and reporting, including how to determine trial size.