Classification of gastric cancer by EBV status combined with molecular profiling predicts patient prognosis. Issue 1 (6th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: He, Cai‐Yun; Qiu, Miao‐Zhen; Yang, Xin‐Hua; Zhou, Da‐Lei; Ma, Jiang‐Jun; Long, Ya‐Kang; Ye, Zu‐Lu; Xu, Bo‐Heng; Zhao, Qi; Jin, Ying; Lu, Shi‐Xun; Wang, Zhi‐Qiang; Guan, Wen‐Long; Zhao, Bai‐Wei; Zhou, Zhi‐Wei; Shao, Jian‐Yong; Xu, Rui‐Hua
• Is Part Of: Clinical and translational medicine. Volume 10:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 353
• Page End: 362
• Publication Date: 2020-05-06
• Subjects: copy number variation -- EBV‐associated gastric cancer -- prognosis -- tumor mutation burden; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine, Experimental -- Periodicals; Medical innovations -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals; 616.027
• DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.32
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2001-1326

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To identify how Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) status combined with molecular profiling predicts the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and their associated clinical actionable biomarkers. Experimental Design: A next‐generation sequencing assay targeting 295 cancer‐related genes was performed in 73 EBV‐associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) and 75 EBV‐negative gastric cancer (EBVnGC) specimens and these results were compared with overall survival (OS). Results: PIK3CA, ARID1A, SMAD4, and PIK3R1 mutated significantly more frequently in EBVaGC compared with their corresponding mutation rate in EBVnGC. As the most frequently mutated gene in EBVnGC (62.7%), TP53 also displayed a mutation rate of 15.1% in EBVaGC. PIK3R1 was revealed as a novel mutated gene (11.0%) associated almost exclusively with EBVaGC. PIK3CA, SMAD4, PIK3R1, and BCOR were revealed to be unique driver genes in EBVaGC. ARID1A displayed a significantly large proportion of inactivated variants in EBVaGC. A notable finding was that integrating the EBV status with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and large genomic instability (LGI) categorized the tumors into four distinct molecular subtypes and optimally predicted patient prognosis. The corresponding median OSs for the EBV+/TMB‐high, EBV+/TMB‐low, EBV‐/LGI‐, and EBV‐/LGI+ subtypes were 96.2, 75.3, 44.4, and 20.2 months, respectively. The different subtypes were significantly segregated according to distinct mutational profiles and pathways. Conclusions: Novel mutations in PIK3R1 and TP53 genes, driver genes such as PIK3CA, SMAD4, PIK3R1, BCOR, and ARID1A, and distinguished genomic profiles from EBVnGC were identified in EBVaGC tumors. The classification of gastric cancer by EBV, TMB, and LGI could be a good prognostic indicator, and provides distinguishing, targetable markers for treatment.