Effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered by general nurses for alcohol use disorders in people living with HIV in Zimbabwe: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Issue 12 (13th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Madhombiro, Munyaradzi; Kidd, Martin; Dube, Bazondlile; Dube, Michelle; Mutsvuke, Wilson; Muronzie, Thabani; Zhou, Danai Tavonga; Derveeuw, Sarah; Chibanda, Dixon; Chingono, Alfred; Rusakaniko, Simbarashe; Hutson, Alan; Morse, Gene D; Abas, Melanie A; Seedat, Soraya
• Is Part Of: Journal of the International AIDS Society. Volume 23:Issue 12(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-12-13
• Subjects: LMIC -- risk factors -- Africa -- alcohol disorders -- cognitive behavioural therapies -- motivational interviewing; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Periodicals; 616.9792005
• DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25641
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-2652

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: There have been very few randomized clinical trials of interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD) in people living with HIV (PLWH) in African countries. This is despite the fact that alcohol use is one of the modifiable risk factors for poor virological control in PLWH on antiretroviral therapy. Methods: Sixteen clinic clusters in Zimbabwe were selected through stratified randomization and randomized 1: 1 to Intervention and Control arms. Inclusion criteria for individual participants were being adult, living with HIV and a probable alcohol use disorder as defined by a score of 6 (women) or 7 (men) on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). In the Intervention clusters, participants received 8 to 10 sessions of Motivational Interviewing blended with brief Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (MI‐CBT). In the control clusters, participants received four Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) sessions based on the alcohol treatment module from the World Health Organisation mhGAP intervention guide. General Nurses from the clinics were trained to deliver both treatments. The primary outcome was a change in AUDIT score at six‐month post‐randomization. Viral load, functioning and quality of life were secondary outcomes. A random‐effects analysis‐of‐covariance model was used to account for the cluster design. Results: Two hundred and thirty‐four participants (n = 108 intervention and n = 126 control) were enrolled across 16 clinics. Participants were recruited from November 2016 to November 2017 and followed through to May 2018. Their mean age was 43.3 years (SD = 9.1) and 78.6% (n = 184) were male. At six months, the mean AUDIT score fell by −6.15 (95% CI −6.32; −6.00) in the MI‐CBT arm, compared to a fall of − 3.09 95 % CI − 3.21; −2.93) in the EUC arm (mean difference −3.09 (95% CI −4.53 to −1.23) ( p = 0.05). Viral load reduced and quality of life and functioning improved in both arms but the difference between arms was non‐significant. Conclusions: Interventions for hazardous drinking and AUD comprising brief, multiple alcohol treatment sessions delivered by nurses in public HIV facilities in low‐income African countries can reduce problematic drinking among PLWH. Such interventions should be integrated into the primary care management of AUD and HIV and delivered by non‐specialist providers. Research is needed on cost‐effectiveness and implementation of such interventions, and on validation of cut‐points for alcohol use scales in low resource settings, in partnership with those with lived experience of HIV and AUD.