Does Pain Neuroscience Education and Cognition‐Targeted Motor Control Training Improve Cervical Motor Output? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Issue 6 (20th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Willaert, Ward; Malfliet, Anneleen; Coppieters, Iris; Lenoir, Dorine; De Pauw, Robby; Danneels, Lieven; Roussel, Nathalie; Meeus, Mira; Cagnie, Barbara; Nijs, Jo; Kregel, Jeroen
• Is Part Of: Pain practice. Volume 20:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 600
• Page End: 614
• Publication Date: 2020-04-20
• Subjects: exercise therapy -- head movements -- neck pain -- motor activity -- neuroscience education; Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616.0472
• DOI: 10.1111/papr.12884
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1530-7085

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In the context of interventions aimed at reducing pain, disability, and maladaptive pain cognitions in chronic neck pain, it is hypothesized that patients who have greater symptom reduction possibly also demonstrate greater improvement in cervical motor output. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of pain neuroscience education plus cognition‐targeted motor control training on cervical motor output. Methods: Impairments in cervical motor output were measured in 64 subjects with chronic neck pain using standardized tests. Cervical muscle strength, cervical mobility, balance, and cervical neuromuscular control were derived. To assess the differences between groups in response to treatment, a random‐intercept linear mixed‐models analysis, applying a diagonal covariance matrix, was used. Results: A significant treatment × time interaction effect was found for neuromuscular control of the deep cervical flexors, favoring the experimental treatment at 3 months' follow‐up (mean group difference: 1.982; 95% confidence interval 0.779, 3.185; large effect size d = 0.82). Significant main effects of time were found for the neuromuscular capacity of scapulothoracic muscles and for cervical mobility. No significant effects were found for balance, cervical muscle strength, or endurance of cervical flexors. Conclusion: Pain neuroscience education combined with cognition‐targeted motor control training is not more effective than biomedically focused education and exercise therapy for improving cervical motor output in people with chronic neck pain. Our findings question the relative importance of factors such as pain, disability, and maladaptive pain cognitions on cervical motor output and the need to address it in treatment.