Efficacy and tolerability of tirzepatide, a dual glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate different dose‐escalation regimens. Issue 6 (11th February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and tolerability of tirzepatide, a dual glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate different dose‐escalation regimens. Issue 6 (11th February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and tolerability of tirzepatide, a dual glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate different dose‐escalation regimens
- Authors:
- Frias, Juan Pablo
Nauck, Michael A.
Van, Joanna
Benson, Charles
Bray, Ross
Cui, Xuewei
Milicevic, Zvonko
Urva, Shweta
Haupt, Axel
Robins, Deborah A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of tirzepatide treatment using three different dose‐escalation regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: In this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive either once‐weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide or placebo. The tirzepatide dose groups and dose‐escalation regimens were: 12 mg (4 mg weeks 0–3; 8 mg weeks 4–7; 12 mg weeks 8–11), 15 mg‐1 (2.5 mg weeks 0–1; 5 mg weeks 2–3; 10 mg weeks 4–7; 15 mg weeks 8–11) and 15 mg‐2 (2.5 mg weeks 0–3; 7.5 mg weeks 4–7; 15 mg weeks 8–11). The primary objective was to compare tirzepatide with placebo in HbA1c change from baseline at 12 weeks. Results: Overall, 111 patients were randomized: placebo, 26; tirzepatide 12 mg, 29; tirzepatide 15 mg‐1, 28; tirzepatide 15 mg‐2, 28. The mean age was 57.4 years, HbA1c 8.4% and body mass index 31.9 kg/m 2 . At week 12, absolute HbA1c change from baseline (SE) was greater in the tirzepatide treatment groups compared with placebo (placebo, +0.2% [0.21]; 12 mg, −1.7% [0.19]; 15 mg‐1, −2.0% [0.20]; 15 mg‐2, −1.8% [0.19]). The incidence of nausea was: placebo, 7.7%; 12 mg group, 24.1%; 15 mg‐1 group, 39.3%; 15 mg‐2 group, 35.7%. Three patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events, one from each of the placebo, 12 mg and 15 mg‐1 groups. Conclusions: Tirzepatide treatment for 12 weeks resulted in clinically significant reductions in HbA1c. This suggests that lower startingAbstract: Aim: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of tirzepatide treatment using three different dose‐escalation regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: In this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive either once‐weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide or placebo. The tirzepatide dose groups and dose‐escalation regimens were: 12 mg (4 mg weeks 0–3; 8 mg weeks 4–7; 12 mg weeks 8–11), 15 mg‐1 (2.5 mg weeks 0–1; 5 mg weeks 2–3; 10 mg weeks 4–7; 15 mg weeks 8–11) and 15 mg‐2 (2.5 mg weeks 0–3; 7.5 mg weeks 4–7; 15 mg weeks 8–11). The primary objective was to compare tirzepatide with placebo in HbA1c change from baseline at 12 weeks. Results: Overall, 111 patients were randomized: placebo, 26; tirzepatide 12 mg, 29; tirzepatide 15 mg‐1, 28; tirzepatide 15 mg‐2, 28. The mean age was 57.4 years, HbA1c 8.4% and body mass index 31.9 kg/m 2 . At week 12, absolute HbA1c change from baseline (SE) was greater in the tirzepatide treatment groups compared with placebo (placebo, +0.2% [0.21]; 12 mg, −1.7% [0.19]; 15 mg‐1, −2.0% [0.20]; 15 mg‐2, −1.8% [0.19]). The incidence of nausea was: placebo, 7.7%; 12 mg group, 24.1%; 15 mg‐1 group, 39.3%; 15 mg‐2 group, 35.7%. Three patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events, one from each of the placebo, 12 mg and 15 mg‐1 groups. Conclusions: Tirzepatide treatment for 12 weeks resulted in clinically significant reductions in HbA1c. This suggests that lower starting doses and smaller dose increments are associated with a more favourable side effect profile. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. Volume 22:Issue 6(2020)
- Journal:
- Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 6(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0022-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 938
- Page End:
- 946
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02-11
- Subjects:
- antidiabetic drug -- glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue -- glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide -- incretin therapy -- randomized trial -- type 2 diabetes
Diabetes -- Periodicals
Obesity -- Periodicals
Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals
Clinical pharmacology -- Periodicals
616.462 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1462-8902&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1463-1326 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/dom.13979 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1462-8902
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3579.601970
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21667.xml