Novel predictors of stent under‐expansion regarding calcified coronary lesions assessed by optical coherence tomography. (24th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ma, Wenshuai; Wang, Qiuhe; Wang, Bin; Wang, Chiyao; Niu, Xiaona; Zhang, Dongwei; Liu, Hui; Niu, Xiaolin; Liu, Yin; Guo, Wangang; Lu, Shaoping; Chu, Yi; Li, Yan
• Other Names: Gao Runlin guestEditor.; Xu Bo guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 99(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 1473
• Page End: 1481
• Publication Date: 2022-02-24
• Subjects: calcium lesion -- coronary angiography -- percutaneous coronary intervention -- ROC curve; Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals; 616.1207572
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30118
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-1946

Abstract

Abstract: A previous calcium scoring system using circumferential angle, thickness, and length of coronary calcium by OCT could assist in predicting stent under‐expansion. However, this scoring system only reflects the calcification distribution within a single cross‐section and fails to consider the lumen's original size. The current study aims to investigate whether novel parameters to quantify calcium lesions, including calcium burden, area, and volume assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), could predict stent under‐expansion related to calcium lesions. Consecutive patients admitted between March 10th to October 19th 2021 with calcified coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with OCT guidance were screened for inclusion. The calcium burden, area, and volume of the target lesions were measured using OCT at pre‐PCI. After successful stent implantation, stent expansion at the corresponding lesions was also measured by OCT. A total of 125 patients who underwent OCT‐guided PCI were included in this study. While the calcium grades by angiography failed to show a significant correlation with stent expansion, maximum and average calcium burden, maximum calcium area, and calcium volume exhibited a moderate correlation with stent expansion. According to the receiver operating characteristic curves, the optimal cutoffs of calcium volume and area for predicting stent under‐expansion were 4.37 mm 3 and 2.48 mm 2, respectively. Calcium burden, area, and volume by OCT are more favorable predictors of stent under‐expansion given its better performance than calcium grades by angiography. Using cutoffs of calcium area and volume could identify high‐risk patients of under‐expansion and might guide future clinical practice.