Joint analysis of species and genetic variation to quantify the role of dispersal and environmental constraints in community turnover. Issue 5 (8th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baselga, Andrés; Gómez‐Rodríguez, Carola; Araújo, Miguel B.; Castro‐Insua, Adrián; Arenas, Miguel; Posada, David; Vogler, Alfried P.
• Is Part Of: Ecography. Volume 2022:Issue 5
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-03-08
• Subjects: beta diversity -- community turnover -- dispersal limitation -- ecological niche -- genetic diversity -- phylogenetic scaling; Ecology -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; 574.5
• DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05808
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-7590

Abstract

Abstract : Spatial turnover of biological communities is determined by both dispersal and environmental constraints. However, we lack quantitative predictions about how these factors interact and influence turnover across genealogical scales. In this study, we have implemented a predictive framework based on approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) to quantify the signature of dispersal and environmental constraints in community turnover. First, we simulated the distribution of haplotypes, intra‐specific lineages and species in biological communities under different strengths of dispersal and environmental constraints. Our simulations show that spatial turnover rate is invariant across genealogical scales when dispersal limitation determines the species ranges. However, when environmental constraint limits species ranges, spatial turnover rates vary across genealogical scales. These simulations were used in an ABC framework to quantify the role of dispersal and environmental constraints in 16 empirical biological communities sampled from local to continental scales, including several groups of insects (both aquatic and terrestrial), molluscs and bats. In seven datasets, the observed genealogical invariance of spatial turnover, assessed with distance–decay curves, suggests a dispersal‐limited scenario. In the remaining datasets, the variance in distance–decay curves across genealogical scales was best explained by various combinations of dispersal and environmental constraints. Our study illustrates how modelling spatial turnover at multiple genealogical scales (species and intraspecific lineages) provides relevant insights into the relative role of dispersal and environmental constraints in community turnover.