Boosting manure biogas production with the application of pretreatments: A meta-analysis. (15th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anacleto, Thuane Mendes; Oliveira, Helena Rodrigues; Diniz, Vinícius Lacerda; de Oliveira, Vinícius Peruzzi; Abreu, Fernanda; Enrich-Prast, Alex
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 362(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-08-15
• Subjects: Anaerobic digestion -- Pretreatment -- Manure -- Biogas -- Methane -- Meta-analysis; AAS Aqueous Ammonia Soaking -- AD Anaerobic Digestion -- BS Biological Supplements -- CI Confidence Intervals -- COD Chemical Oxygen Demand -- EU European Union -- GHG Greenhouse Gas -- LMC Lignocellulolytic Microbial Consortium -- MG Manure Generation -- NBW Nano-bubble Water -- OM Organic Matter -- PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis -- RR Response Ratio -- SMG Specific Manure Generation -- TAN Total Ammonia Nitrogen -- TS Total Solids -- USA United States of America -- VS Volatile Solids; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132292
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a versatile manure management approach that can combine waste treatment, energy generation and nutrient recovery, thus playing a central role in circular economy. The AD process is highly influenced by manure composition which, depending on the source, may contain high loads recalcitrant materials (e.g., lignocellulosic and fibers) or lead to the formation of toxic compounds (e.g., NH3 ), decreasing the energetic potential of the waste and requiring specific pretreatments to increase its degradability and biogas production. Although there are distinctions in the chemical composition of manure according to animal diets, different manure sources are usually grouped together, leading to a suboptimal performance of both the pretreatment and the AD process. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 54 studies to evaluate the effects of different pretreatments on different manure types and their effect on methane (CH4 ) yield and we estimated the energy potential if the appropriate pretreatment is applied to largest manure producing countries. The results showed that chemical and/or biological pretreatments were more effective for omnivore manure (e.g., swine, chicken), while physical and a combination of chemical and physical pretreatments negatively affected CH4 production. Physical and/or chemical pretreatments had a positive effect on CH4 yield from herbivore manure (e.g., cattle, horses), while biological pretreatments had a negative effect. The application of the adequate pretreatment can more than double the energy recovered from manure, allowing for an important substitution of fossil fuels, while decreasing operational costs and environmental risks and ultimately improving profitability. The development of pretreatment technologies and their application are strongly related to public policies for sustainable manure management and biogas use and production. Highlights: CH4 production from different manure sources varies with different pretreatments. Chemical and biological pretreatments increase CH4 production from omnivore manure. Physical and chemical pretreatments increase CH4 production from herbivore manure. The appropriate pretreatment can increase CH4 yield up to ten times.