Freshwater zooplankton metapopulations and metacommunities respond differently to environmental and spatial variation. Issue 1 (20th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martin, Gillian K.; Beisner, Beatrix E.; Chain, Frédéric J. J.; Cristescu, Melania E.; del Giorgio, Paul A.; Derry, Alison M.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 102:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-20
• Subjects: crustacean zooplankton -- DNA barcoding -- IBD -- IBE -- lake -- metabarcoding -- metacommunity -- metapopulation -- rotifer; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3224
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract: Theory predicts that population genetic structure and metacommunity structure are linked by the common processes of drift and migration, but how population genetic structure and metacommunity structure are related in nature is still unknown. Deeper understanding of the processes influencing both genetic and community diversity is vital for better predicting how environmental change will impact biodiversity patterns. We examined how crustacean zooplankton and rotifer species' metapopulation genetic structure and metacommunities respond to environmental and spatial variation both within and across four regions of boreal Canada. Metapopulation and metacommunity variation partitioning results were compared within and across the four regions. Metapopulations and metacommunities responded differently to environmental variation and spatial structure both within and across regions, as metapopulations were influenced by different environmental variables compared to metacommunities. At larger spatial scales both metapopulations and metacommunities exhibited greater spatial and environmental structuring, again responding to a different subset of environmental variables. Our findings suggest that even though both genetic and species diversity are linked by the same processes, regional variation in environmental characteristics and spatial structure influence resulting biodiversity patterns differently. To date, no other empirical research has explored relationships between entire metapopulation and metacommunity assemblages at large regional spatial scales.