Associations between in-vivo glenohumeral joint motion and morphology. Issue 12 (18th September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Peltz, Cathryn D.; Divine, George; Drake, Anne; Ramo, Nicole L.; Zauel, Roger; Moutzouros, Vasilios; Bey, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomechanics. Volume 48:Issue 12(2015)
• Page Start: 3252
• Page End: 3257
• Publication Date: 2015-09-18
• Subjects: Rotator cuff -- Critical shoulder angle -- Glenoid inclination -- Glenoid morphology -- Glenohumeral joint motion; Animal mechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Mécanique animale -- Périodiques; Biomécanique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 571.4305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.030
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9290

Abstract

Abstract: Joint morphology has a significant influence on joint motion and may contribute to the development of rotator cuff pathology, but the relationships between glenohumeral joint (GHJ) morphology and in-vivo GHJ motion are not well understood. The objectives of this study were to assess measures of joint morphology and their relationship with in-vivo joint motion in two populations: shoulders with intact rotator cuffs ( n =48) and shoulders with rotator cuff pathology ( n =36, including 5 symptomatic tears, 9 asymptomatic tears and 22 repaired tears). GHJ morphology was measured from CT-based three-dimensional models of the humerus and scapula. In-vivo GHJ motion was measured during shoulder abduction using biplane x-ray imaging. Associations between GHJ morphology and motion were assessed with univariate and best subsets regression. The only morphological difference identified between the populations was the critical shoulder angle (intact: 34.5±4.7°, pathologic: 36.9±5.0°, p =0.03), which is consistent with previous research. In intact shoulders, the superior/inferior (S/I) position of the humerus on the glenoid during shoulder abduction was significantly associated with the glenoid's S/I radius of curvature ( p <0.01), conformity index ( p <0.01), and stability angle ( p <0.01). Furthermore, the S/I position of the humerus on the glenoid was negatively associated with the critical shoulder angle ( p =0.04), which contradicts previous research. No significant associations between GHJ morphology and GHJ motion were detected in shoulders with rotator cuff tears. It is unknown if rotator cuff pathology compromises the relationships between GHJ morphology and motion, or if the absence of this relationship is a pre-existing condition that increases the likelihood of pathology.