Magnetic Resonance Elastography-derived Stiffness Predicts Renal Function Loss and Is Associated With Microvascular Inflammation in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Issue 6 (13th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shatil, Anwar S.; Kirpalani, Anish; Younus, Eyesha; Tyrrell, Pascal N.; Krizova, Adriana; Yuen, Darren A.
• Is Part Of: Transplantation direct. Volume 8:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: e1334
• Publication Date: 2022-05-13
• Subjects: Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; Transplantation -- Periodicals; 362.19795
• DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001334
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2373-8731

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Organ stiffening can be caused by inflammation and fibrosis, processes that are common causes of transplant kidney dysfunction. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a contrast-free, noninvasive imaging modality that measures kidney stiffness. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of MRE to serve as a prognostic factor for renal outcomes. Methods: Patients were recruited from the St Michael's Hospital Kidney Transplant Clinic. Relevant baseline demographic, clinical, and Banff histologic information, along with follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data, were recorded. Two-dimensional gradient-echo MRE imaging was performed to obtain kidney "stiffness" maps. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to examine for relationships between stiffness and microvascular inflammation score. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess the relationship between stiffness and eGFR change over time controlling for other baseline variables. A G 2 -likelihood ratio Chi-squared test was performed to compare between the baseline models with and without "stiffness." Results: Sixty-eight transplant kidneys were scanned in 66 patients (mean age 56 ± 12 y, 24 females), with 38 allografts undergoing a contemporaneous biopsy. Mean transplant vintage was 7.0 ± 6.8 y. In biopsied allografts, MRE-derived allograft stiffness was associated only with microvascular inflammation (Banff g + ptc score, Spearman ρ = 0.43, P = 0.01), but no other histologic parameters. Stiffness was negatively associated with eGFR change over time (Stiffness × Time interaction β = –0.80, P < 0.0001), a finding that remained significant even when adjusted for biopsy status and baseline variables (Stiffness × Time interaction β = –0.46, P = 0.04). Conversely, the clinical models including "stiffness" showed significantly better fit ( P = 0.04) compared with the baseline clinical models without "stiffness." Conclusions: MRE-derived renal stiffness provides important prognostic information regarding renal function loss for patients with allograft dysfunction, over and above what is provided by current clinical variables.