Impact of underwater noise on the growth, physiology and behavior of Micropterus salmoides in industrial recirculating aquaculture systems. (15th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hang, Shengyu; Zhao, Jian; Ji, Baimin; Li, Haijun; Zhang, Yadong; Peng, Zequn; Zhou, Fan; Ding, Xueyan; Ye, Zhangying
• Is Part Of: Environmental pollution. Volume 291(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-12-15
• Subjects: Industrial recirculating aquaculture systems -- Underwater soundscape -- Micropterus salmoides -- Growth -- Physiology -- Behavior; Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Périodiques; Pollution -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Pollution -- Effets physiologiques -- Périodiques; Pollution; Pollution -- Environmental aspects; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.73
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118152
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-7491

Abstract

Abstract: The operation of the equipment in industrial recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) affects the underwater soundscape of aquaculture tanks where fishes live. This study evaluated the influence of commercial industrial RAS noise on the growth, physiology, and behavior of juvenile largemouth bass ( Micropterus salmoides ). In this study, two experimental groups, the RAS noise group (115 dB re 1 μPa RMS) and the ambient group (69 dB re 1 μPa RMS), were studied. The water quality and feeding regime for each group were kept the same during the 60-day experiment. Results showed that there was no significant difference in the average daily feed intake of the fish between the two treatments, while the rate of weight gain of the ambient group (755.27 ± 65.62%) was significantly higher than that of the noise group (337.66 ± 88.01%). In addition, the RAS environmental noise also had an adverse effect on the anti-oxidation and immune systems of the fish based on results of analysis of blood, liver, and intestinal samples. Moreover, environmental noise affected the swimming behavior of the fish school. The mean angle and distance between the focal fish and its nearest neighbor fish in RAS noise group were 33.3° and 92.1 mm, respectively, which were larger than those of the ambient group with 24.4° and 89.5 mm, respectively. From the above results, RAS noise did influence the welfare of largemouth bass, and the soundscape in RAS hence should be managed in real production. Highlights: Evaluate the impact of industrial recirculating aquaculture systems noise on growth performance of largemouth bass. Assess the anti-oxidation and immune indices affected by the noise. Quantify the impact of the noise on swimming behavior of fish school.