Early postoperative complications and their measures after skull base reconstruction: A study from the standpoint of plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Issue 5 (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tanaka, Kentaro; Suesada, Nobuko; Homma, Tsutomu; Hidaka, Takeaki; Mori, Hiroki; Okazaki, Mutsumi; Sugawara, Takashi; Tsutsumi, Takeshi; Asakage, Takahiro
• Is Part Of: Auris nasus larynx. Volume 49:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 845
• Page End: 855
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Skull base reconstruction -- Early postoperative complication -- Plastic and reconstructive treatment; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.03.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0385-8146

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: In skull base surgery, postoperative complications may be lethal and it is important to know how to deal with these. There are several reports on complications after skull base reconstruction, but it is difficult to understand which are important for plastic surgeons in charge of reconstruction. The objective of this study is to clarify the early postoperative survival-related complications after skull base reconstruction of which plastic surgeons should participate in treatment. Methods: One hundred and seventy-seven patients who underwent skull base reconstruction at our department over the last 12 years were retrospectively surveyed. The cases of early complications in which plastic surgeons were actively involved in treatment were investigated and the preventive measures actually taken at our facility are examined in addition to treatment methods after development. Results: Plastic surgical complications were wound infection in seven patients, impaired blood flow in transplanted tissue in two patients, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in five patients, and intracranial compression in three patients. Total number of postoperative complications were seventeen and the total complication rate was 9.6%. Complication rates tended to be higher in anterior-middle skull base cases than in anterior or middle alone cases and higher with free tissue transfer than with locoregional flap. Multivariate analysis revealed that operation time was a significantly higher risk factor ( p =0.012) and preoperative chemotherapy was a significantly lower risk factor ( p =0.033) for the development of complications. It was also found that the hospitalization length was significantly longer when complications occurred ( p <0.0001). Wound infection was treated with removal of the cause, sufficient drainage, and irrigation. Regarding preventive measures, it is necessary to pay attention especially to intracranial contamination with epithelial components. Rapid surgical measures were necessary when blood flow of the transplanted tissue was impaired. For pedicle flaps, conservation of the feeding vessel is needed, and for free flaps, reliable vascular anastomosis is needed as preventive measures. Plastic surgeons play a role in reducing the risk of cerebrospinal fluid leakage through covering the repaired dura mater with tissue with favorable blood flow, especially in reoperation after development of leakage. Skull base reconstruction with soft tissue may cause intracranial compression, and sometimes, it is not resolved by conservative treatment and reoperation is selected. Conclusion: Plastic surgical postoperative complications were clarified, and treatment methods and preventive measures for them were examined. Careful consideration of blood flow, placement, and volume of the transplanted flap is important to prevent complications.