Limitations on validating slitted sound absorber designs through budget additive manufacturing. (June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Opiela, K.C.; Zieliński, T.G.; Attenborough, K.
• Is Part Of: Materials & design. Volume 218(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-06
• Subjects: Slitted sound absorber -- Additive manufacturing -- Microstructure-based modelling; Materials -- Periodicals; Engineering design -- Periodicals; Matériaux -- Périodiques; Conception technique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 620.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110703
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-1275

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Slitted sound absorbers have primitive yet acoustically absorptive structure. Samples composed just of inclined slits cannot be measured in an impedance tube. Perforation and zigzags open up an inclined slit network of a cylindrical sample. Absorption predictions are compared with measurements made on 3D printed samples. Budget additive manufacturing yields geometrical imperfections in the samples. Abstract: The potential usefulness of relatively simple pore microstructures such as parallel, identical, inclined slits for creating broadband sound absorption has been argued through analytical models. In principle, such microstructures could be realised through budget additive manufacturing. However, validation of the analytical predictions through normal incidence impedance tube measurements on finite layers is made difficult by the finite size of the tube. The tube walls curtail the lengths of inclined slits and, as a result, prevent penetration of sound through the layer. As well as demonstrating and modelling this effect, this paper explores two manufacturing solutions. While analytical and numerical predictions correspond well to absorption spectra measured on slits normal to the surface, discrepancies between measured and predicted sound absorption are noticed for perforated and zigzag slit configurations. For perforated microgeometries this is found to be the case with both numerical and analytical modelling based on variable length dead-end pores. Discrepancies are to be expected since the dead-end pore model does not allow for narrow pores in which viscous effects are important. For zigzag slits it is found possible to modify the permeability used in the inclined slit analytical model empirically to obtain reasonable agreement with data.