Health and social outcomes in the Housing First model: Testing the theory of change. (May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Campo, Patricia; Stergiopoulos, Vicky; Davis, Owen; Lachaud, James; Nisenbaum, Rosane; Dunn, James R.; Ahmed, Naveed; Tsemberis, Sam
• Is Part Of: EClinicalMedicine. Volume 47(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05
• Subjects: Homelessness -- Theory of change -- Quality of life -- Recovery; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Clinical Medicine; Health Policy; Public Health; Medical policy; Medicine -- Research; Periodical; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 613
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101387
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2589-5370

Abstract

Summary: Background: Homelessness continues to grow globally. The Housing First (HF) model offers immediate access to housing and support services without preconditions and has a growing body of evidence documenting its effectiveness at ending homelessness. HF has a robust theory of change that hypothesizes how unique program components (i.e., immediate access to housing, separation of services from housing, client choice, etc.) drive positive social and health changes over time. We advance the understanding of how HF causes client improvement by empirically testing this program's theory of change. Methods: Using a unique longitudinal quantitative data from the large Canadian At Home/Chez Soi Housing First trial we used path analysis to test the theory of change for Quality of Life, Crisis related events or service utilization, and Recovery. Program pathways and health and social outcomes were measured at enrolment, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-enrolment. Findings: Most hypothesized pathways were confirmed with path analysis. Confirmed pathways for two outcomes– Quality of Life (QOL) and Recovery – were similar. Health and social consultations at enrolment, health status at 6- and 12-months post enrolment, and social connectedness at 12-months were important predictors of the 24-month outcomes of Quality of Life and Recovery, but not for Crisis related events or service utilization. Interpretation: This analysis directly responds to recent calls for more empirical evidence about intervention mechanisms. Ensuring linkages to health and social service consultations for clients, supporting clients' engagement with family and community, and enabling clients to improve or maintain good health will drive better longer term client outcomes within Housing First. Funding: Funding Mental Health Commission of Canada.