Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress on clinical outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Issue 5 (25th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McMorrow, Rita; Hunter, Barbara; Hendrieckx, Christel; Kwasnicka, Dominika; Speight, Jane; Cussen, Leanne; Ho, Felicia Ching Siew; Emery, Jon; Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 5(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05-25
• Subjects: %20Type%202">Diabetes Mellitus -- Type 2 -- Depression -- Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054650
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: This study examined the effect of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) routinely to assess and address depressive symptoms and diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. Design: A systematic review of published peer-reviewed studies. Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Eligibility criteria: Studies including adults with type 2 diabetes, published in English, from the inception of the databases to 24 February 2022 inclusive; and where the intervention included completion of a PROM of depressive symptoms and/or diabetes distress, with feedback of the responses to a healthcare professional. Data extraction and synthesis: Using Covidence software, screening and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two reviewers independently with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Results: The search identified 4512 citations, of which 163 full-text citations were assessed for eligibility, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies involved assessment of depressive symptoms only, two studies assessed diabetes distress only, and two studies assessed both. All studies had an associated cointervention. When depressive symptoms were assessed (n=7), a statistically significant between-group difference in depressive symptoms was observed in five studies; with a clinically significant (> 0.5%) between-group difference in HbA1c in two studies. When diabetes distress was assessed (n=4), one study demonstrated statistically significant difference in depressive symptoms and diabetes distress; with a clinically significant between-group difference in HbA1c observed in two studies. Conclusion: Studies are sparse in which PROMs are used to assess and address depressive symptoms or diabetes distress during routine clinical care of adults with type 2 diabetes. Further research is warranted to understand how to integrate PROMs into clinical care efficiently and determine appropriate interventions to manage identified problem areas. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020200246.