Value of cerebrospinal fluid white cell count and protein level in predicting leptomeningeal involvement by systemic aggressive B‐cell lymphoma. (15th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bennett, Rory; Ruskova, Anna; Petrasich, Michelle; Theakston, Edward
• Is Part Of: International journal of laboratory hematology. Volume 44:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 490
• Page End: 496
• Publication Date: 2022-02-15
• Subjects: flow cytometry -- lymphoma; Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13815
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-5521

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for patients with newly diagnosed aggressive B‐cell lymphoma at risk of secondary central nervous system involvement typically includes multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), cytology (CC), white cell count (WCC) and total protein. The strength of relationships between MFC results and the remaining variables has been disputed in small studies. We explored these relationships in a large homogeneous cohort of patient samples, aiming to establish the relationship between WCC and protein level and MFC results. Methods: Adult patients with aggressive B‐cell lymphoma at risk of CNS involvement who underwent staging CSF analysis by MFC were identified retrospectively from institutional electronic records between October 2011 and December 2020. Results: Three hundred and seventy eight samples, including 45 (11.9%) MFC+ samples, were analysed. The relative sensitivity of CC for MFC positivity was 0.38, with PPV of 0.68. Significantly higher median WCC ( p < .001) and protein levels ( p = .011) were seen in MFC+ vs. MFC− samples. MFC + CC+ (vs. MFC + CC− samples) demonstrated higher median neoplastic events and neoplastic cell concentration. WCC ≥36 × 10 6 /L and protein ≥1.12 g/L cut‐off values demonstrated the highest PPVs for MFC positivity (0.67 and 0.88, respectively). Conclusions: Statistically significant associations exist between elevated WCC and protein and MFC positivity, and selected WCC and protein cut‐off values have PPVs comparable to that of cytological assessment. Whilst routine WCC and protein analysis may be unnecessary, WCC/protein values above these levels could be regarded as reasonable evidence of CSF involvement in the appropriate setting.