Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon‐beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon‐beta in moderately ill patients with COVID‐19: A randomized clinical trial. Issue 7 (24th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hassaniazad, Mehdi; Farshidi, Hossein; Gharibzadeh, Abdollah; Bazram, Ali; Khalili, Elham; Noormandi, Afsaneh; Fathalipour, Mohammad
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical virology. Volume 94:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 3184
• Page End: 3191
• Publication Date: 2022-03-24
• Subjects: antiviral agents -- interferon -- SARS‐coronavirus; Virology -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27724
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-6615

Abstract

Abstract: Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP ( n = 33) and LPV/RTV ( n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups ( p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.