'Why Should I Take the COVID-19 Vaccine after Recovering from the Disease?' A Mixed-methods Study of Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability among Health Workers in Northern Nigeria. (19th May 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 'Why Should I Take the COVID-19 Vaccine after Recovering from the Disease?' A Mixed-methods Study of Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability among Health Workers in Northern Nigeria. (19th May 2022)
- Main Title:
- 'Why Should I Take the COVID-19 Vaccine after Recovering from the Disease?' A Mixed-methods Study of Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability among Health Workers in Northern Nigeria
- Authors:
- Iliyasu, Zubairu
Garba, Muhammad R.
Gajida, Auwalu U.
Amole, Taiwo G.
Umar, Amina A.
Abdullahi, Hadiza M.
Kwaku, Aminatu A.
Salihu, Hamisu M.
Aliyu, Muktar H. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: We assessed the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine, predictors, and reasons for vaccine hesitancy among clinical and non-clinical staff at a tertiary hospital in Kano, northern Nigeria. Using a mixed-methods design, structured questionnaires were administered to 284 hospital staff, followed by 20 in-depth interviews with a purposive sub-sample. Logistic regression and the framework approach were used to analyze the data. Only 24.3% ( n = 69) of the respondents were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Acceptance was lower among females (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.37, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI): 0.18–0.77 (male vs. female), nurses/midwives (aOR = 0.41, 95%CI:0.13–0.60, physicians vs. nurses/midwives), persons not tested for COVID-19 (aOR = 0.32, 95%CI 0.13–0.79) (no vs. yes) and those who perceived themselves to be at low risk of COVID-19 (aOR = 0.47, 95%CI, 0.21–0.89, low vs. high). In contrast, vaccine acceptance was higher among more experienced workers (aOR = 2.28, 95%CI:1.16–8.55, ≥10 vs. <5 years). Vaccine acceptance was also higher among persons who did not worry about vaccine efficacy (aOR = 2.35, 95%CI:1.18–6.54, no vs. yes), or about vaccine safety (aOR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.16–5.09, no vs. yes), side effects (aOR = 1.85, 95%CI:1.17–5.04, no vs. yes), or rumors (aOR = 2.55, 95%CI:1.25–5.20, no vs. yes). The top four reasons for vaccine hesitancy included distrust, inadequate information, fear of long-term effects, and infertility-related rumors.ABSTRACT: We assessed the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine, predictors, and reasons for vaccine hesitancy among clinical and non-clinical staff at a tertiary hospital in Kano, northern Nigeria. Using a mixed-methods design, structured questionnaires were administered to 284 hospital staff, followed by 20 in-depth interviews with a purposive sub-sample. Logistic regression and the framework approach were used to analyze the data. Only 24.3% ( n = 69) of the respondents were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Acceptance was lower among females (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.37, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI): 0.18–0.77 (male vs. female), nurses/midwives (aOR = 0.41, 95%CI:0.13–0.60, physicians vs. nurses/midwives), persons not tested for COVID-19 (aOR = 0.32, 95%CI 0.13–0.79) (no vs. yes) and those who perceived themselves to be at low risk of COVID-19 (aOR = 0.47, 95%CI, 0.21–0.89, low vs. high). In contrast, vaccine acceptance was higher among more experienced workers (aOR = 2.28, 95%CI:1.16–8.55, ≥10 vs. <5 years). Vaccine acceptance was also higher among persons who did not worry about vaccine efficacy (aOR = 2.35, 95%CI:1.18–6.54, no vs. yes), or about vaccine safety (aOR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.16–5.09, no vs. yes), side effects (aOR = 1.85, 95%CI:1.17–5.04, no vs. yes), or rumors (aOR = 2.55, 95%CI:1.25–5.20, no vs. yes). The top four reasons for vaccine hesitancy included distrust, inadequate information, fear of long-term effects, and infertility-related rumors. Concerted efforts are required to build COVID-19 vaccine confidence among health workers in Kano, Nigeria.Our findings can help guide implementation of COVID-19 vaccination in similar settings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pathogens and global health. Volume 116:Number 4(2022)
- Journal:
- Pathogens and global health
- Issue:
- Volume 116:Number 4(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 116, Issue 4 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 116
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0116-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 254
- Page End:
- 262
- Publication Date:
- 2022-05-19
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- vaccine hesitancy -- vaccine acceptance -- health workers
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Public health -- International cooperation -- Periodicals
World health -- Periodicals
362.1969 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ypgh20/current ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/pgh ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/20477724.2021.2011674 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2047-7724
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21534.xml