Inter Organizational Practice Committee Recommendations/Guidance for Teleneuropsychology in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. (15th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bilder, Robert M; Postal, Karen S; Barisa, Mark; Aase, Darrin M; Cullum, C Munro; Gillaspy, Stephen R; Harder, Lana; Kanter, Geoffrey; Lanca, Margaret; Lechuga, David M; Morgan, Jennifer M; Most, Randi; Puente, Antonio E; Salinas, Christine M; Woodhouse, Jonathan
• Is Part Of: Archives of clinical neuropsychology. Volume 35:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 647
• Page End: 659
• Publication Date: 2020-07-15
• Subjects: Teleneuropsychology -- Recommendations -- COVID-19 -- Neuropsychological assessment; Clinical neuropsychology -- Periodicals; 616.805
• DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acaa046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0887-6177

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The Inter Organizational Practice Committee convened a workgroup to provide rapid guidance about teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: A collaborative panel of experts from major professional organizations developed provisional guidance for neuropsychological practice during the pandemic. The stakeholders included the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology/American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology, the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Division 40 of the American Psychological Association, the American Board of Professional Neuropsychology, and the American Psychological Association Services, Inc. The group reviewed literature; collated federal, regional, and state regulations and information from insurers; and surveyed practitioners to identify best practices. Results: Literature indicates that TeleNP may offer reliable and valid assessments, but clinicians need to consider limitations, develop new informed consent procedures, report modifications of standard procedures, and state limitations to diagnostic conclusions and recommendations. Specific limitations affect TeleNP assessments of older adults, younger children, individuals with limited access to technology, and individuals with other individual, cultural, and/or linguistic differences. TeleNP may be contraindicated or infeasible given specific patient characteristics, circumstances, and referral questions. Considerations for billing TeleNP services are offered with reservations that clinicians must verify procedures independently. Guidance about technical issues and "tips" for TeleNP procedures are provided. Conclusion: This document provides provisional guidance with links to resources and established guidelines for telepsychology. Specific recommendations extend these practices to TeleNP. These recommendations may be revised as circumstances evolve, with updates posted continuously at IOPC.online .