A machine learning approach to correct for mass resolution effects in simulated halo clustering statistics. Issue 3 (5th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Forero-Sánchez, Daniel; Chuang, Chia-Hsun; Rodríguez-Torres, Sergio; Yepes, Gustavo; Gottlöber, Stefan; Zhao, Cheng
• Is Part Of: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 513:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 4318
• Page End: 4331
• Publication Date: 2022-05-05
• Subjects: methods: data analysis -- methods: statistical -- large-scale structure of Universe; Astronomy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1239
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8711

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The increase in the observed volume in cosmological surveys imposes various challenges on simulation preparations. First, the volume of the simulations required increases proportionally to the observations. However, large-volume simulations are quickly becoming computationally intractable. Secondly, on-going and future large-volume survey are targeting smaller objects, e.g. emission line galaxies, compared to the earlier focus, i.e. luminous red galaxies. They require the simulations to have higher mass resolutions. In this work, we present a machine learning (ML) approach to calibrate the halo catalogue of a low-resolution (LR) simulation by training with a paired high-resolution (HR) simulation with the same background white noise, thus we can build the training data by matching HR haloes to LR haloes in a one-to-one fashion. After training, the calibrated LR halo catalogue reproduces the mass–clustering relation for mass down to 2.5 × 10 11 h −1 M⊙ within 5 per cent at scales $k\lt 1\, h\, \rm Mpc^{-1}$ . We validate the performance of different statistics including halo mass function, power spectrum, two-point correlation function, and bispectrum in both real and redshift space. Our approach generates HR-like halo catalogues (>200 particles per halo) from LR catalogues (>25 particles per halo) containing corrected halo masses for each object. This allows to bypass the computational burden of a large-volume real high-resolution simulation without much compromise in the mass resolution of the result. The cost of our ML approach (∼1 CPU-h) is negligible compared to the cost of a N -body simulation (e.g. millions of CPU-h), The required computing time is cut a factor of 8.