Synchronization of Great Subduction Megathrust Earthquakes: Insights From Scale Model Analysis. Issue 4 (2nd April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rosenau, Matthias; Horenko, Illia; Corbi, Fabio; Rudolf, Michael; Kornhuber, Ralf; Oncken, Onno
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 124:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 3646
• Page End: 3661
• Publication Date: 2019-04-02
• Subjects: subduction megathrust earthquakes -- recurrence behavior -- seismic cycles -- synchronization -- analogue model; Geomagnetism -- Periodicals; Geochemistry -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Earth sciences -- Periodicals; 551.1
• DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016597
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9313

Abstract

Abstract: The magnitude of great subduction megathrust earthquakes is controlled mainly by the number of adjacent asperities failing synchronously and the resulting rupture length. Here we investigate experimentally the long‐term recurrence behavior of a pair of asperities coupled by static stress transfer over hundreds of seismic cycles. We statistically analyze long (c. 500 ka) time series of M8‐9 analogue earthquakes simulated using a seismotectonic scale model approach with two aims: First, to constrain probabilistic measures (frequency‐size distribution, variability) useful for hazard assessment and, second, to relate them with geometric observables (coseismic slip pattern, locking pattern). We find that the number of synchronized asperity failures relative to the number of individual asperity failures as well as the coefficients of variation of recurrence intervals and seismic moment scale with the logarithm of stress coupling between the asperities. Accordingly, tighter packed asperities tend to recur more periodically and with a more characteristic magnitude while more distant asperities show clustering of more variable sized events. The probability of synchronized failures seems to be controlled to first order by geometrical relations (i.e., spacing and offset of asperities). The effects of rheological properties are evident but it remains to be explored to which extent they vary in nature and how sensitive the system is to those. Key Points: We tested geometric controls on asperity interaction and subduction earthquake recurrence behavior using seismotectonic scale modeling Simulated analogue earthquake sequences mimic long‐term behavior of a system of two asperities coupled by static stress transfer The degree of synchronization and intrinsic variability is controlled by the asperity distribution