A comparison of analytical strategies for cluster randomized trials with survival outcomes in the presence of competing risks. (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Fan; Lu, Wenhan; Wang, Yuxuan; Pan, Zehua; Greene, Erich J; Meng, Guanqun; Meng, Can; Blaha, Ondrej; Zhao, Yize; Peduzzi, Peter; Esserman, Denise
• Is Part Of: Statistical methods in medical research. Volume 31:Number 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1224
• Page End: 1241
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: Multivariate survival analysis -- competing risks -- time-to-event outcomes -- Fine and Gray model -- sandwich variance estimator -- permutation test; Medicine -- Research -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Review Literature -- Periodicals; Statistics -- methods -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Recherche -- Méthodes statistiques -- Périodiques; 610.727
• DOI: 10.1177/09622802221085080
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-2802

Abstract

While statistical methods for analyzing cluster randomized trials with continuous and binary outcomes have been extensively studied and compared, little comparative evidence has been provided for analyzing cluster randomized trials with survival outcomes in the presence of competing risks. Motivated by the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders trial, we carried out a simulation study to compare the operating characteristics of several existing population-averaged survival models, including the marginal Cox, marginal Fine and Gray, and marginal multi-state models. For each model, we found that adjusting for the intraclass correlations through the sandwich variance estimator effectively maintained the type I error rate when the number of clusters is large. With no more than 30 clusters, however, the sandwich variance estimator can exhibit notable negative bias, and a permutation test provides better control of type I error inflation. Under the alternative, the power for each model is differentially affected by two types of intraclass correlations—the within-individual and between-individual correlations. Furthermore, the marginal Fine and Gray model occasionally leads to higher power than the marginal Cox model or the marginal multi-state model, especially when the competing event rate is high. Finally, we provide an illustrative analysis of Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders trial using each analytical strategy considered.