Dutch forensic patients with and without intellectual disabilities: A comparison of demographic, offence, and diagnostic characteristics. (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Keulen-de Vos, Marije; de Klerk, Anke
• Is Part Of: Research in developmental disabilities. Volume 126(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: Intellectual disability -- Violence -- Sexual offending -- Characteristics -- Offence; Developmental disabilities -- Periodicals; Developmentally disabled -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Developmentally disabled children -- Education -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Developmental Disabilities -- Periodicals; Disabled -- Periodicals; Mental Retardation -- rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Personnes atteintes de troubles du développement -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Enfants atteints de troubles du développement -- Éducation -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Développement, Troubles du -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; 616.858800
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104255
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0891-4222

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Patients with an intellectual disability (ID) and offending histories constitute a challenging clinical group. The present study examined commonalities and differences in demographic, diagnostic and offence characteristics in patients with and without intellectual disabilities who were either convicted for violent or sexual offences and who resided in mandated care in the Netherlands. Method: We compared 165 offenders with an ID to 249 offenders without an ID. We compared both groups by type of offence (i.e., sexual versus violent offence) using Mann–Whitney U -test or independent samples t -tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Results: In general, forensic patients with an ID were younger at admission ( U =357, z = −12.668, p < .001), had more prior convictions for violent offences ( χ 2 (1)= 6.175, p = .013) and more prevalent diagnoses of substance abuse disorders ( χ 2 (1)= 9.266, p = .002) than those without an ID. Similar results were found for patients with IDs with sexual offence histories. Conclusion: A clear understanding of distinct characteristics of forensic patients with intellectual disabilities is crucial in understanding (sexual) violent behavior in this population as it may assist clinicians in prioritizing intervention strategies. Highlights: The study had a retrospective archival research design. We examined commonalities and differences among patients with and without IDs. There were differences between ID and non-ID types of patients. ID patients have more convictions for violent offences and prevalent substance use disorders Similar profiles were found in ID patients with sexual offences.