Calculation of Critical Speed from Raw Training Data in Recreational Marathon Runners. Issue 12 (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: SMYTH, BARRY; MUNIZ-PUMARES, DANIEL
• Is Part Of: Medicine and science in sports and exercise. Volume 52:Issue 12(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: EXERCISE -- PERFORMANCE -- PREDICTION -- RUNNING; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Health aspects -- Periodicals; 612.044
• DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002412
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-9131

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Critical speed (CS) represents the highest intensity at which a physiological steady state may be reached. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether estimations of CS obtained from raw training data can predict performance and pacing in marathons. Methods: We investigated running activities logged into an online fitness platform by >25, 000 recreational athletes before big-city marathons. Each activity contained time, distance, and elevation every 100 m. We computed grade-adjusted pacing and the fastest pace recorded for a set of target distances (400, 800, 1000, 1500, 3000, and 5000 m). CS was determined as the slope of the distance–time relationship using all combinations of, at least, three target distances. Results: The relationship between distance and time was linear, irrespective of the target distances used (pooled mean ± SD: R 2 = 0.9999 ± 0.0001). The estimated values of CS from all models were not different (3.74 ± 0.08 m·s −1 ), and all models correlated with marathon performance ( R 2 = 0.672 ± 0.036, error = 8.01% ± 0.51%). CS from the model including 400, 800, and 5000 m best predicted performance ( R 2 = 0.695, error = 7.67%) and was used in further analysis. Runners completed the marathon at 84.8% ± 13.6% CS, with faster runners competing at speeds closer to CS (93.0% CS for 150 min marathon times vs 78.9% CS for 360 min marathon times). Runners who completed the first half of the marathon at >94% of their CS, and particularly faster than CS, were more likely to slowdown by more than 25% in the second half of race. Conclusion: This study suggests that estimations of CS from raw training data can successfully predict marathon performance and provide useful pacing information. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text.