Supplying Pharmacist Home Visit and Anticoagulation Professional Consultation During Transition of Care for Patients With Venous Thromboembolism. Issue 4 (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kapoor, Alok; Landyn, Valentina; Wagner, Joann; Burgwinkle, Pamela; Huang, Wei; Gore, Joel; Spencer, Frederick A.; Goldberg, Robert; McManus, David D.; Darling, Chad; Boudreaux, Edwin; Barton, Bruce; Mazor, Kathleen M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of patient safety. Volume 16:Issue 4(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: venous thromboembolism -- anticoagulation -- care transitions -- clinical pharmacology -- medication safety -- patient education; Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 610.289
• DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000571
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-8417

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, satisfaction, and effectiveness of a care transition intervention with pharmacist home visit and subsequent anticoagulation expert consultation for patients with new episode of venous thromboembolism within a not-for-profit health care network. Methods: We randomized patients to the intervention or control. During the home visit, a clinical pharmacist assessed medication management proficiency, asked open-ended questions to discuss knowledge gaps, and distributed illustrated medication instructions. Subsequent consultation with anticoagulation expert further filled knowledge gaps. At 30 days, we assessed satisfaction with the intervention and also measured the quality of care transition, knowledge of anticoagulation and venous thromboembolism, and anticoagulant beliefs (level of agreement that anticoagulant is beneficial, is worrisome, and is confusing/difficult to take). Results: The mean ± SD time required to conduct home visits was 52.4 ± 20.5 minutes and most patients agreed that the intervention was helpful. In general, patients reported a high-quality care transition including having been advised of safety issues related to medications. Despite that, the mean percentage of knowledge items answered correctly among patients was low (51.5 versus 50.7 for intervention and controls, respectively). We did not find any significant difference between intervention and control patients for care transition quality, knowledge, or anticoagulant beliefs. Conclusions: We executed a multicomponent intervention that was feasible and rated highly. Nevertheless, the intervention did not improve care transition quality, knowledge, or beliefs. Future research should examine whether alternate strategies potentially including some but not all components of our intervention would be more impactful. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text.