Shared decision making in primary care: Process evaluation of the intervention in the OPTIMAL study, a cluster randomised trial. Issue 3 (June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Shared decision making in primary care: Process evaluation of the intervention in the OPTIMAL study, a cluster randomised trial. Issue 3 (June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Shared decision making in primary care: Process evaluation of the intervention in the OPTIMAL study, a cluster randomised trial
- Authors:
- Den Ouden, Henk
Vos, Rimke C.
Pieterse, Arwen H.
Rutten, Guy E.H.M. - Abstract:
- Highlights: Perceived level of SDM was high at baseline, shortly after the GPs' training. At the end of the intervention, patients perceived lower levels of SDM. We recommend repeated SDM training to maintain high degrees of SDM. Abstract: Aims: To analyse the performance of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) intervention, we assessed perceived and experienced SDM in General Practitioners (GPs) and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods: Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial (cRCT) testing the effect of a decision aid. Opinions and experienced role regarding SDM were assessed in 72 patients and 18 GPs with the SDM-Q-9 (range 0–45) and Control Preferences Scale (CPS, 0–5), and observed SDM with the OPTION5 (0–20). SDM at baseline was compared to 24 months' follow-up using paired t-tests. Results: At baseline, perceived levels of SDM did not significantly differ between GPs and patients with T2DM (difference of 2.3, p = 0.24). At follow-up, mean patients' perceived level of SDM was 7.9 lower compared to baseline (p < 0.01), whereas GPs' opinions had not changed significantly. After both visits, mean CPS scores differed significantly between patients and GPs. OPTION5 scores ranged between 6 and 20. Conclusion: Patients and GPs perceived similar baseline levels of SDM. Two years later, patients perceived less SDM, while GPs did not change their opinion. SDM was appropriate immediately after training, but perhaps GPs fell back in old habits over time. We recommend repeated SDMHighlights: Perceived level of SDM was high at baseline, shortly after the GPs' training. At the end of the intervention, patients perceived lower levels of SDM. We recommend repeated SDM training to maintain high degrees of SDM. Abstract: Aims: To analyse the performance of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) intervention, we assessed perceived and experienced SDM in General Practitioners (GPs) and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods: Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial (cRCT) testing the effect of a decision aid. Opinions and experienced role regarding SDM were assessed in 72 patients and 18 GPs with the SDM-Q-9 (range 0–45) and Control Preferences Scale (CPS, 0–5), and observed SDM with the OPTION5 (0–20). SDM at baseline was compared to 24 months' follow-up using paired t-tests. Results: At baseline, perceived levels of SDM did not significantly differ between GPs and patients with T2DM (difference of 2.3, p = 0.24). At follow-up, mean patients' perceived level of SDM was 7.9 lower compared to baseline (p < 0.01), whereas GPs' opinions had not changed significantly. After both visits, mean CPS scores differed significantly between patients and GPs. OPTION5 scores ranged between 6 and 20. Conclusion: Patients and GPs perceived similar baseline levels of SDM. Two years later, patients perceived less SDM, while GPs did not change their opinion. SDM was appropriate immediately after training, but perhaps GPs fell back in old habits over time. We recommend repeated SDM training. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Primary care diabetes. Volume 16:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- Primary care diabetes
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0016-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 375
- Page End:
- 380
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06
- Subjects:
- Shared decision making -- Primary care -- Type 2 diabetes -- Decision aid
Diabetes -- Periodicals
616.462 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.primary-care-diabetes.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17519918 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/primary-care-diabetes ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.02.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1751-9918
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6612.908208
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21499.xml