Prefabrication technique by preserving a muscular pedicle from masseter muscle as an in vivo bioreactor for reconstruction of mandibular critical‐sized bone defects in canine models. Issue 7 (15th February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prefabrication technique by preserving a muscular pedicle from masseter muscle as an in vivo bioreactor for reconstruction of mandibular critical‐sized bone defects in canine models. Issue 7 (15th February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Prefabrication technique by preserving a muscular pedicle from masseter muscle as an in vivo bioreactor for reconstruction of mandibular critical‐sized bone defects in canine models
- Authors:
- Nokhbatolfoghahaei, Hanieh
Bastami, Farshid
Farzad‐Mohajeri, Saeed
Rezai Rad, Maryam
Dehghan, Mohammad Mehdi
Bohlouli, Mahboubeh
Farajpour, Hekmat
Nadjmi, Nasser
Khojasteh, Arash - Abstract:
- Abstract: In vivo bioreactors serve as regenerative niches that improve vascularization and regeneration of bone grafts. This study has evaluated the masseter muscle as a natural bioreactor for βTCP or PCL/βTCP scaffolds, in terms of bone regeneration. The effect of pedicle preservation, along with sole, or MSC‐ or rhBMP2‐combined application of scaffolds, has also been studied. Twenty‐four mongrel dogs were randomly placed in six groups, including βTCP, βTCP/rhBMP2, βTCP/MSCs, PCL/βTCP, PCL/βTCP/rhBMP2, and PCL/βTCP/MSCs. During the first surgery, the scaffolds were implanted into the masseter muscle for being prefabricated. After 2 months, each group was divided into two subgroups prior to mandibular bone defect reconstruction; one with a preserved vascularized pedicle and one without. After 12 weeks, animals were euthanized, and new bone formation was evaluated using histological analysis. Histological analysis showed that all β‐TCP scaffold groups had resulted in significantly greater rates of new bone formation, either with a pedicle surgical approach or non‐pedicle surgical approach, comparing to their parallel groups of βTCP/PCL scaffolds ( p ≤ .05). Pedicled β‐TCP scaffold groups that were treated with either rhBMP2 (48.443% ± 0.250%) or MSCs (46.577% ± 0.601%) demonstrated the highest rates of new bone formation ( p ≤ .05). Therefore, masseter muscle can be used as a local in vivo bioreactor with potential clinical advantages in reconstruction of human mandibularAbstract: In vivo bioreactors serve as regenerative niches that improve vascularization and regeneration of bone grafts. This study has evaluated the masseter muscle as a natural bioreactor for βTCP or PCL/βTCP scaffolds, in terms of bone regeneration. The effect of pedicle preservation, along with sole, or MSC‐ or rhBMP2‐combined application of scaffolds, has also been studied. Twenty‐four mongrel dogs were randomly placed in six groups, including βTCP, βTCP/rhBMP2, βTCP/MSCs, PCL/βTCP, PCL/βTCP/rhBMP2, and PCL/βTCP/MSCs. During the first surgery, the scaffolds were implanted into the masseter muscle for being prefabricated. After 2 months, each group was divided into two subgroups prior to mandibular bone defect reconstruction; one with a preserved vascularized pedicle and one without. After 12 weeks, animals were euthanized, and new bone formation was evaluated using histological analysis. Histological analysis showed that all β‐TCP scaffold groups had resulted in significantly greater rates of new bone formation, either with a pedicle surgical approach or non‐pedicle surgical approach, comparing to their parallel groups of βTCP/PCL scaffolds ( p ≤ .05). Pedicled β‐TCP scaffold groups that were treated with either rhBMP2 (48.443% ± 0.250%) or MSCs (46.577% ± 0.601%) demonstrated the highest rates of new bone formation ( p ≤ .05). Therefore, masseter muscle can be used as a local in vivo bioreactor with potential clinical advantages in reconstruction of human mandibular defects. In addition, scaffold composition, pedicle preservation, and treatment with MSCs or rhBMP2, influence new bone formation and scaffold degradation rates in the prefabrication technique. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of biomedical materials research. Volume 110:Issue 7(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of biomedical materials research
- Issue:
- Volume 110:Issue 7(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 110, Issue 7 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 110
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0110-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 1675
- Page End:
- 1686
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-15
- Subjects:
- 3D printed scaffold -- bioreactor -- bone regeneration -- critical‐sized bone defect -- prefabrication technique -- stem cell -- βTCP -- βTCP/PCL
Biomedical materials -- Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/jbm.b.35028 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1552-4973
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4953.725000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21499.xml