Acceptability of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative in Tanzania: A mixed methods process evaluation of the moderating factors. (24th December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Acceptability of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative in Tanzania: A mixed methods process evaluation of the moderating factors. (24th December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Acceptability of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative in Tanzania: A mixed methods process evaluation of the moderating factors
- Authors:
- Kalolo, Albino
Kapologwe, Ntuli A.
Samky, Hendry
Kibusi, Stephen M. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Despite wide agreement that stakeholder acceptability plays a critical role in an intervention's effectiveness, gaps remain on understanding acceptability of complex health financing interventions. We aimed to understand the moderators of acceptability of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative across primary health facilities in Tanzania. Employing a mixed methods approach and guided by the theoretical framework for acceptability (TFA), we collected data from implementers and their supervisors using a structured questionnaire and semi‐structured interview guides. We analysed data using a chi square test, logistic regression, and thematic analysis. We recruited 238 participants, of whom 71% were females and 54% were below 37 years old. Acceptability was found to be 63% and received high rating in qualitative interviews. Moderators of acceptability included sex (AOR = 1.93, p = 006), work experience (AOR = 3.47, p = 0.001), knowledge (13.8, p = 0.00), supportive work environment (AOR = 2.28, p = 0.019), and capability to implement the programme (AOR = 0.12, p = 0.00). Moderators reported in qualitative interviews related to individual and contextual factors. This study suggests that the DHFF initiative is acceptable and influenced by factors operating at the individual level and beyond. Addressing moderators of acceptability as programs are designed and implemented is the holy grail of acceptability of complex interventions. Highlights:Abstract: Despite wide agreement that stakeholder acceptability plays a critical role in an intervention's effectiveness, gaps remain on understanding acceptability of complex health financing interventions. We aimed to understand the moderators of acceptability of the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative across primary health facilities in Tanzania. Employing a mixed methods approach and guided by the theoretical framework for acceptability (TFA), we collected data from implementers and their supervisors using a structured questionnaire and semi‐structured interview guides. We analysed data using a chi square test, logistic regression, and thematic analysis. We recruited 238 participants, of whom 71% were females and 54% were below 37 years old. Acceptability was found to be 63% and received high rating in qualitative interviews. Moderators of acceptability included sex (AOR = 1.93, p = 006), work experience (AOR = 3.47, p = 0.001), knowledge (13.8, p = 0.00), supportive work environment (AOR = 2.28, p = 0.019), and capability to implement the programme (AOR = 0.12, p = 0.00). Moderators reported in qualitative interviews related to individual and contextual factors. This study suggests that the DHFF initiative is acceptable and influenced by factors operating at the individual level and beyond. Addressing moderators of acceptability as programs are designed and implemented is the holy grail of acceptability of complex interventions. Highlights: Effectiveness of any intervention depends on its level of acceptability by stakeholders. This study demonstrates that the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF) initiative was highly accepted amid the influence of individual, contextual, and program factors. The Theoretical framework for acceptability (TFA) provided a clear view of acceptability of the initiative and the likelihood of its utilization in routine appraisal of acceptability of complex interventions. Designers and supervisors of complex programs, should consider drivers of acceptability and design implementation guidance and strategies accordingly. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of health planning and management. Volume 37:Number 3(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of health planning and management
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Number 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0037-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 1381
- Page End:
- 1401
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12-24
- Subjects:
- acceptability -- complex interventions -- direct health facility financing -- frontline implementers -- primary health care -- Tanzania
Health planning -- Periodicals
Health services administration -- Periodicals
Santé publique -- Planification -- Périodiques
Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques
362.1068 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/hpm.3402 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0749-6753
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.277600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21526.xml