Fully Automated Placental Volume Quantification From 3D Ultrasound for Prediction of Small‐for‐Gestational‐Age Infants. (23rd September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schwartz, Nadav; Oguz, Ipek; Wang, Jiancong; Pouch, Alison; Yushkevich, Natalie; Parameshwaran, Shobhana; Gee, James; Yushkevich, Paul; Oguz, Baris
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 41:Number 6(2022)
• Page Start: 1509
• Page End: 1524
• Publication Date: 2021-09-23
• Subjects: 3DUS -- convolutional neural networks -- deep learning -- placenta -- small‐for‐gestational‐age; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15835
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Early placental volume (PV) has been associated with small‐for‐gestational‐age infants born under the 10th/5th centiles (SGA10/SGA5). Manual or semiautomated PV quantification from 3D ultrasound (3DUS) is time intensive, limiting its incorporation into clinical care. We devised a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) pipeline for fully automated placenta segmentation from 3DUS images, exploring the association between the calculated PV and SGA. Methods: Volumes of 3DUS obtained from singleton pregnancies at 11–14 weeks' gestation were automatically segmented by our CNN pipeline trained and tested on 99/25 images, combining two 2D and one 3D models with downsampling/upsampling architecture. The PVs derived from the automated segmentations (PVCNN ) were used to train multivariable logistic‐regression classifiers for SGA10/SGA5. The test performance for predicting SGA was compared to PVs obtained via the semiautomated VOCAL (GE‐Healthcare) method (PVVOCAL ). Results: We included 442 subjects with 37 (8.4%) and 18 (4.1%) SGA10/SGA5 infants, respectively. Our segmentation pipeline achieved a mean Dice score of 0.88 on an independent test‐set. Adjusted models including PVCNN or PVVOCAL were similarly predictive of SGA10 (area under curve [AUC]: PVCNN = 0.780, PVVOCAL = 0.768). The addition of PVCNN to a clinical model without any PV included (AUC = 0.725) yielded statistically significant improvement in AUC ( P < .05); whereas PVVOCAL did not ( P = .105). Moreover, when predicting SGA5, including the PVCNN (0.897) brought statistically significant improvement over both the clinical model (0.839, P = .015) and the PVVOCAL model (0.870, P = .039). Conclusions: First trimester PV measurements derived from our CNN segmentation pipeline are significantly associated with future SGA. This fully automated tool enables the incorporation of including placental volumetric biometry into the bedside clinical evaluation as part of a multivariable prediction model for risk stratification and patient counseling.