Current Status Regarding the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Issue 3 (August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Puzzitiello, Richard N.; Moverman, Michael A.; Pagani, Nicholas R.; Menendez, Mariano E.; Salzler, Matthew J.
• Is Part Of: HSS journal. Volume 18:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 428
• Page End: 438
• Publication Date: 2022-08
• Subjects: outpatient -- total shoulder arthroplasty -- ambulatory procedure -- ambulatory surgery center -- COVID-19 -- safety; Musculoskeletal system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal System -- surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedic Procedures -- Periodicals; Orthopédie -- Périodiques; Appareil locomoteur -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Appareil locomoteur -- Maladies -- Patients -- Réadaptation -- Périodiques; 617.47005
• DOI: 10.1177/15563316211019398
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1556-3316

Abstract

Background: Surgeons have begun to transition total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to the outpatient setting in order to contain costs and reallocate resources. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient TSA by assessing associated complication rates, clinical outcomes, and total treatment charges. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases were queried in March 2020 for studies on outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were (1) a study population undergoing TSA, (2) discharge on the day of surgery, and (3) inclusion of at least 1 reported outcome. Results: Of 20 studies identified that met inclusion criteria, 14 were comparative studies involving an inpatient control group, 2 of which were matched by age and comorbidities. The remaining studies used control groups consisting of inpatient TSAs who were older or more medically infirm according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. The combined average age of the outpatient and inpatient groups was 66.5 and 70.1 years, respectively. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA had similar rates of readmissions, emergency department visits, and perioperative complications in comparison to inpatients. Patients also reported comparably high levels of satisfaction with outpatient procedures. Four economic analyses demonstrated substantial cost savings with outpatient TSA in comparison to inpatient surgery. Conclusion: In carefully selected patients, outpatient TSA appears to be equally safe but less resource intensive than inpatient arthroplasty. Nonetheless, there remains a need for larger prospective studies to decisively characterize the relative safety of outpatient TSA among patients with similar baseline health.