"The Fans of Michael Jackson v Wade Robson and James Safechuck": Forensic Fandom and the Staging of a Media Tribunal. (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Keidl, Philipp Dominik
• Other Names: Williams Rebecca guest-editor.; Bennett Lucy guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: American behavioral scientist. Volume 66:Number 8(2022)
• Page Start: 1106
• Page End: 1122
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: Media tribunal -- forensic fandom -- Michael Jackson -- YouTube -- sexual abuse; Social sciences -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals; United States -- Social conditions -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; 300
• DOI: 10.1177/00027642211042285
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-7642

Abstract

This essay analyses fan reactions to the sexual abuse allegations brought forward against Michael Jackson in Leaving Neverland (Dan Reed, 2019 ). In particular, it focuses on fans' production of nonfiction media produced in defense of Jackson, trying to restore the artist's reputation by discrediting his accusers. Based on textual and content analysis of videos by The Michael Jackson Innocent Project (MJIP) and its wider network, this essay positions these videos within the context of documentaries and nonfiction programs produced on the singer. Arguing that the videos represent a form of "forensic fandom, " the essay maintains that fans stage a "media tribunal" against Jackson's accusers to defend the singer. Because of their biased argumentation, however, fans reinforce myths about disingenuous allegations of sexual violence.