Eosinophilic Asthma Secondary to Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in a Melanoma Patient. (30th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kissoonsingh, P.; Sutton, B.; Iqbal, Syed U.; Pallan, Lalit; Steven, Neil; Khoja, L.
• Other Names: Cives Mauro Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Case reports in oncological medicine. Volume 2022(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-04-30
• Subjects: Oncology -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Oncology -- Case studies -- Periodicals; Neoplasms; Oncology; Tumors; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Case studies; Periodicals; Case Reports; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/2658136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-6706

Abstract

Abstract : Background . Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors are a new standard of care in melanoma. However, the immune related toxicity associated with these agents can be serious, and the long-term implications are yet to be defined especially in the adjuvant setting. We report, to our knowledge, the first case of anti-PD-1-induced eosinophilic asthma in a melanoma patient treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab. Case Presentation. A 72-year-old man commenced pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting after resection of a stage IIIB cutaneous melanoma. The patient experienced episodes of breathlessness 4 weeks after cycle 1. These episodes were nocturnal and caused acute respiratory distress and cough, occasionally waking him up. The episodes progressed, and he was admitted after cycle 2 with a productive cough, wheeze, and breathlessness. Observations showed saturations on air of 94% and a respiratory rate of 19/min. The only laboratory abnormality was a raised eosinophil count of 1.1 × 10 9 . Spirometry showed a FEV1 of 2.57 (91% predicted), FVC of 4.04 (108% predicted), and ratio of 64%. Peak expiratory flow rate was 94% predicted, and corrected gas transfer was 6.29 (78% predicted) with KCO 1.18 (93% predicted). FeNO was raised at 129 indicating inflammation of his airways, and peak flow was 422 l/min. CT of the chest did not show pneumonitis or other lung pathology. A diagnosis of acute eosinophilic asthma was made. Treatment with steroids and beclometasone dipropionate and formoterol inhaler produced rapid resolution of symptoms and normalisation of the eosinophil count. Pembrolizumab was safely recommenced once steroids had discontinued and symptoms had resolved. Conclusions . Specialist respiratory input was needed for optimal patient management and is ongoing. Although a safe rechallenge with pembrolizumab was possible, treatment in the adjuvant setting is curative in intent and long-term safety follow-up is required to assess for delayed toxicity and long-term health implications. This is likely to require large regional/national/international databases to detect, monitor, and educate the wider medical community as these patients are followed up in primary care following initial specialist follow-up.