Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. Issue 2 (10th January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. Issue 2 (10th January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma
- Authors:
- Wolchok, Jedd D.
Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna
Gonzalez, Rene
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Rutkowski, Piotr
Lao, Christopher D.
Cowey, C. Lance
Schadendorf, Dirk
Wagstaff, John
Dummer, Reinhard
Ferrucci, Pier Francesco
Smylie, Michael
Butler, Marcus O.
Hill, Andrew
Márquez-Rodas, Ivan
Haanen, John B. A. G.
Guidoboni, Massimo
Maio, Michele
Schöffski, Patrick
Carlino, Matteo S.
Lebbé, Céleste
McArthur, Grant
Ascierto, Paolo A.
Daniels, Gregory A.
Long, Georgina V.
Bas, Tuba
Ritchings, Corey
Larkin, James
Hodi, F. Stephen - Abstract:
- Abstract : PURPOSE: In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Median OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF -mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF –wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, andAbstract : PURPOSE: In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Median OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF -mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF –wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: These 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy. Abstract : … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical oncology. Volume 40:Issue 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 40:Issue 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 40, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0040-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 127
- Page End:
- 137
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01-10
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Periodicals
Oncology
Medical Oncology
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancérologie
Cancer
Oncology
Oncologia
Càncer
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jco.org/ ↗
http://jco.ascopubs.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1200/JCO.21.02229 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0732-183X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21446.xml