Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 29 (10th October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 29 (10th October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Authors:
- Lambertini, Matteo
Blondeaux, Eva
Bruzzone, Marco
Perachino, Marta
Anderson, Richard A.
de Azambuja, Evandro
Poorvu, Philip D.
Kim, Hee Jeong
Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia
Pistilli, Barbara
Vaz-Luis, Ines
Saura, Cristina
Ruddy, Kathryn J.
Franzoi, Maria Alice
Sertoli, Chiara
Ceppi, Marcello
Azim, Hatem A.
Amant, Frederic
Demeestere, Isabelle
Del Mastro, Lucia
Partridge, Ann H.
Pagani, Olivia
Peccatori, Fedro A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : PURPOSE: Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS: Of 6, 462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8, 093, 401 women from the general population and 112, 840 patients with BC of whom 7, 505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. ComparedAbstract : PURPOSE: Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS: Of 6, 462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8, 093, 401 women from the general population and 112, 840 patients with BC of whom 7, 505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. Compared to patients with BC without subsequent pregnancy, those with a pregnancy had better disease-free survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89) and overall survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68). Similar results were observed after correcting for potential confounders and irrespective of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pregnancy outcome, and timing of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: These results provide reassuring evidence on the safety of conceiving in BC survivors. Patients' pregnancy desire should be considered a crucial component of their survivorship care plan. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical oncology. Volume 39:Issue 29(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Issue 29(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 29 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 29
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0039-0029-0000
- Page Start:
- 3293
- Page End:
- 3305
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10-10
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Periodicals
Oncology
Medical Oncology
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancérologie
Cancer
Oncology
Oncologia
Càncer
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jco.org/ ↗
http://jco.ascopubs.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1200/JCO.21.00535 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0732-183X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21442.xml